Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026
Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment
Published on: March 24, 2020
Pediatric teleophthalmology screening: a scoping review of global evidence and implications for Canada
Kyran Sachdeva1, Michelle Turcios2, Carlos Eduardo Solarte3
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Insights
Pediatric teleophthalmology shows promise for improving children's vision screening in Canada, offering cost-effective and accessible eye care. Further research is needed to address implementation gaps, especially for rural and Indigenous populations.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Public Health
- Health Technology
Background:
- Canadian children under 6 face significant gaps in comprehensive eye exams, risking missed diagnoses of conditions like amblyopia and strabismus.
- National guidelines recommend early eye exams, yet access remains a challenge, contributing to preventable vision loss and health inequities.
Conclusions:
- Teleophthalmology presents a promising solution for enhancing pediatric vision screening capacity and accessibility in Canada.
- Limited Canadian validation studies necessitate further implementation research.
- Urgent research is needed on rural/Indigenous communities, non-ROP conditions, and patient-centered outcomes for equitable integration.
Background:
In Canada, nearly 90% of children under 6 have never received a comprehensive eye exam, despite national guidelines recommending at least 1 before age 5. Missed diagnoses of amblyopia, strabismus, and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) contribute to preventable vision loss and inequities.
Objective:
To synthesize evidence on pediatric teleophthalmology screening, evaluating performance, feasibility, and economic considerations, with attention to relevance in the Canadian context.
Methods:
A scoping review was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus (2005-2025) for studies assessing teleophthalmology screening in children. Screening was performed in duplicate, with data extracted on modalities, conditions, settings, and costs.
Results:
Of 3 752 identified studies, 30 met inclusion criteria, involving >15,000 children. Digital retinal imaging (n = 18), video (n = 7), and smartphone-based tools (n = 5) demonstrated diagnostic performance comparable to gold-standard in-person exams in most reports. Cost-analysis studies consistently found teleophthalmology to be more cost-effective than in-person screening. Barriers included equipment costs, staff training, and poor connectivity in rural areas; facilitators included reduced costs and expanded screening capacity. Evidence gaps remain for non-ROP conditions (e.g., amblyopia, strabismus, retinoblastoma) and for rural, low-resource, and Indigenous populations.
Conclusions:
Teleophthalmology shows promise for expanding pediatric vision screening capacity and accessibility in Canada. However, Canadian validation studies are limited. Implementation research focusing on rural and Indigenous communities, non-ROP conditions, and patient-centered outcomes is urgently needed to guide equitable integration into pediatric eye care.
