Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

06:32
A Chitosan Based, Laser Activated Thin Film Surgical Adhesive, 'SurgiLux': Preparation and Demonstration
Published on: October 23, 2012
13.7K
Can lasers replace conventional methods in optimizing bond strength of bioactive materials?
Cansu Atalay1, Ahmet Burak Yuksel2, Ayse Ruya Yazici2,3
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. cansuatalaydr@gmail.com.
Lasers in Medical Science
|November 20, 2025
Summary
This study compared the bond strength of four bioactive dental materials on dentin prepared with a bur versus a laser. Alkasite (Cention Forte) showed the best adhesion, while glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT) performed poorly.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Bioactive restorative materials offer potential benefits like ion release and self-healing properties.
- Dentin surface preparation methods, such as high-speed bur cutting and Er,Cr:YSGG laser ablation, can influence the bonding efficacy of restorative materials.
- Understanding the interaction between material composition and surface treatment is crucial for predictable clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of four distinct bioactive restorative materials bonded to dentin prepared by a high-speed diamond bur or an Er,Cr:YSGG laser.
- To investigate the influence of dentin surface preparation method on the bond strength of different bioactive materials.
- To assess the failure modes at the resin-dentin interface.
Main Methods:
- An in vitro study involving 120 extracted human molars.
- Dentin surfaces were prepared using either a high-speed diamond bur or an Er,Cr:YSGG laser.
- Four material types were tested: glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT), bioactive resin composite (Activa BioActive-Restorative), giomer (Beautifil II), and alkasite (Cention Forte).
- Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine; SEM analysis examined the interface.
Main Results:
- Alkasite (Cention Forte) exhibited the highest shear bond strength irrespective of the dentin surface preparation method.
- Glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT) demonstrated the lowest bond strength.
- Laser preparation significantly reduced bond strength for the bioactive resin composite (Activa BioActive-Restorative) compared to bur preparation.
- Failure analysis indicated a predominance of adhesive failures, with some cohesive failures observed.
Conclusions:
- The bonding performance of bioactive restorative materials is significantly influenced by both their intrinsic properties and the method of dentin surface preparation.
- Cention Forte (alkasite) provides the most reliable adhesion to dentin, regardless of whether it is prepared with a bur or a laser.
- Clinicians should consider the interplay between material choice and surface preparation technique for optimal bonding outcomes in restorative dentistry.

