Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

A Murine Model of Hemodialysis Access-Related Hand Dysfunction
Published on: May 31, 2022
Epidemiology of Vascular Access-Associated Infections in Hemodialysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in
Tamar Kasradze1,2, Tamar Didbaridze3,4, Irma Tchokhonelidze1,2
1Nephrology, Tbilisi State Medical University and Ingorokva High Medical Technology University Clinic, Tbilisi, GEO.
Insights
Central venous catheters (CVCs) significantly increase vascular access (VA) infection risk in hemodialysis (HD) patients compared to arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). Reducing CVC use and improving infection control are crucial for patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Infectious Diseases
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Vascular access (VA)-related infections are a major complication in hemodialysis (HD), increasing morbidity and mortality.
- Central venous catheters (CVCs) pose a higher infection risk than arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), but local data are scarce.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of VA-related infections by access type (CVC vs. AVF) in HD patients.
- To identify risk factors for VA infections, hospitalization, and mortality.
- To provide epidemiological data from a major center in Tbilisi, Georgia.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 386 adult HD patients (January 2022 - January 2025).
- Analysis of demographic, clinical, and VA data.
- Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess infection risk, hospitalization, and mortality associated with CVC vs. AVF, accounting for access-days.
Main Results:
- CVC users had a markedly higher infection rate (0.731/1000 access-days) vs. AVF users (0.042/1000 access-days), IRR=17.25.
- CVC use strongly correlated with bloodstream infections (BSI) (HR=19.18) and infection-related hospitalization (HR=4.10).
- Diabetes showed a weak association with hospitalization (HR=1.04), but not BSIs. Infection-related mortality was 19.8%.
Conclusions:
- Central venous catheter use is a significant, modifiable risk factor for VA-related infections in HD patients.
- Strategies should prioritize timely arteriovenous fistula placement and robust infection control protocols.
- Reducing CVC utilization is essential to decrease infection-related morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients.
Abstract:
Background Infections related to vascular access (VA) remain one of the most serious complications in hemodialysis (HD), contributing substantially to patient morbidity and mortality. Central venous catheters (CVCs) confer a substantially higher infection risk compared to arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), but local epidemiological data are limited. Objective We aimed to investigate the incidence of VA-related infections by access type (CVC vs. AVF, using access-days) and to identify risk factors, with secondary outcomes including infection-related hospitalization and mortality, in HD patients at the largest single center in Tbilisi, Georgia (2022-2025). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 386 adult HD patients from January 2022 to January 2025. Demographic, clinical, and VA data were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models assessed associations between VA type, diabetes, and infection or hospitalization, accounting for person-time at risk. Kaplan-Meier curves compared time-to-infection, and incidence rates were calculated per 1,000 access-days with corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and attributable fractions. Results Out of 386 patients, 208 (53.9%) used CVCs and 178 (46.1%) used AVFs. A total of 116 (30.1%) patients developed bacterial infections, of which 69 (59.5%) were access-related. The infection rate was markedly higher among CVC users compared with AVF users (0.731 vs. 0.042 infections per 1,000 access-days; incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 17.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.21-41.79; p < 0.001). The incidence rate difference was 0.689 infections per 1,000 access-days (95% CI: 0.50-0.88; p < 0.001), with an attributable fraction among the exposed of 94.2% (95% CI: 87.8-97.6). In the univariate Cox regression analysis, CVC use was strongly associated with an increased hazard of bloodstream infections (BSIs) (hazard ratio (HR) = 19.18; 95% CI: 8.72-42.23; p < 0.001) and infection-related hospitalization (HR = 4.10; 95% CI: 2.50-6.71; p < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus was not significantly associated with BSIs (HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.55-1.51; p = 0.715) but showed a weak association with hospitalization (HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00-1.07; p = 0.041). Age was not significantly related to either outcome. Infection-related mortality occurred in 23 (19.8%) patients. Conclusions Using CVCs is a significant and modifiable risk factor for VA-related infections in HD patients. Strategies to reduce CVC use focus on timely AVF placement, and strengthening infection control protocols is essential to decrease infection-related morbidity and mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
