Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

464
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
464
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

4.7K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
4.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PDE4 inhibitor mitigates activated CD8+ T cells through NF-κB signaling in Behçet's syndrome.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

AnalyzAIRR: A user-friendly guided workflow for AIRR data analysis.

Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Post-Chornobyl thyroid papillary carcinomas display distinct past <sup>131</sup>I exposure and radiation-associated carcinogenesis molecular signatures at low and high thyroid doses.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Durable control of autoimmunity requires sustained stimulation of regulatory T cells.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

An immunometabolic signature of major depressive disorder in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2026
Same author

Immune checkpoint-engineered virus-like particles induce antigen-specific immune tolerance and protect against food allergy.

NPJ vaccines·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Measuring TCR-pMHC Binding In Situ using a FRET-based Microscopy Assay
19:05

Measuring TCR-pMHC Binding In Situ using a FRET-based Microscopy Assay

Published on: October 30, 2015

12.8K

Benchmarking unsupervised methods for inferring TCR specificity.

Charline Jouannet1,2, Hélène Vantomme1,2, Kenz Le Gouge1

  • 1Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Immunoregulation-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (i3), 75005, Paris, France.

NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
|November 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Comparing T-cell receptor (TCR) clustering methods reveals performance differences. DeepTCR excels at antigen-specific TCR identification, while others offer varying cluster purity and size, aiding tool selection for adaptive immunity research.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles TRECs and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles KRECs by Real-time PCR
14:14

Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles TRECs and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles KRECs by Real-time PCR

Published on: December 6, 2014

17.3K
Determining Optimal Cytotoxic Activity of Human Her2neu Specific CD8 T cells by Comparing the Cr51 Release Assay to the xCELLigence System
11:31

Determining Optimal Cytotoxic Activity of Human Her2neu Specific CD8 T cells by Comparing the Cr51 Release Assay to the xCELLigence System

Published on: August 8, 2012

25.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Measuring TCR-pMHC Binding In Situ using a FRET-based Microscopy Assay
19:05

Measuring TCR-pMHC Binding In Situ using a FRET-based Microscopy Assay

Published on: October 30, 2015

12.8K
Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles TRECs and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles KRECs by Real-time PCR
14:14

Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles TRECs and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles KRECs by Real-time PCR

Published on: December 6, 2014

17.3K
Determining Optimal Cytotoxic Activity of Human Her2neu Specific CD8 T cells by Comparing the Cr51 Release Assay to the xCELLigence System
11:31

Determining Optimal Cytotoxic Activity of Human Her2neu Specific CD8 T cells by Comparing the Cr51 Release Assay to the xCELLigence System

Published on: August 8, 2012

25.5K

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Understanding T-cell receptor (TCR) specificity is vital for adaptive immunity research.
  • Existing computational methods for inferring TCR specificity lack comprehensive comparative analysis.
  • Clustering algorithms are essential for grouping TCRs with similar specificities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark and compare the performance of nine different TCR clustering methods.
  • To evaluate how effectively these methods identify antigen-specific T-cell receptors.
  • To provide a unified database and performance benchmarks for TCR specificity inference tools.

Main Methods:

  • Curated a unified database of 190,670 human TCRs with known epitope specificities from IEDB, McPAS-TCR, and VDJdb.
  • Benchmarked nine TCR clustering algorithms (DeepTCR, ClusTCR, TCRMatch, GLIPH2, Levenshtein distance, Hamming distance, GIANA, iSMART) on this dataset.
  • Validated findings using a large 10X Genomics dataset with antigen-specific labeled TCRs.

Main Results:

  • DeepTCR showed the highest retention of antigen-specific TCRs.
  • ClusTCR, TCRMatch, and GLIPH2 offered high cluster purity but lower retention.
  • Methods like GLIPH2 and clusTCR produced larger clusters, while GIANA and iSMART generated smaller, antigen-specific clusters.
  • DeepTCR demonstrated superior sensitivity in capturing antigen-specific TCRs.

Conclusions:

  • TCR clustering methods exhibit distinct performance characteristics regarding cluster purity, size, and retention of antigen-specific TCRs.
  • DeepTCR is the most sensitive method for identifying antigen-specific TCRs.
  • This study provides a valuable benchmark to guide researchers in selecting appropriate TCR clustering tools for their specific needs in adaptive immunity research.