Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Polarization and Characterization of M1 and M2 Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages on Implant Surfaces
Published on: December 6, 2024
Ethnic comparison of MacTel over 5 years follow up
Priyanka Gandhi1, Karishma Tendulkar2, Soema Tehbla2
1University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Purpose:
To compare long-term structural disease progression in type 2 macular telangiectasia (MacTel) between Indian and Caucasian populations using a novel optical coherence tomography-based staging system structured around retinal layer involvement.
Methods:
This retrospective, observational, dual-center cohort study included 49 eyes from 30 Caucasian and 109 eyes from 55 Indian patients with type 2 MacTel. All patients had a minimum of 5 years follow-up. Disease severity was staged as early, intermediate, or advanced based on predefined OCT features involving the inner retina, outer retina, and presence of neovascularization. Progression was defined as a shift to a higher stage. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate progression and associated risk factors.
Results:
At baseline, both groups had similar stage distributions (p = 0.451). Over the follow-up period, 82% of Caucasian and 81% of Indian eyes showed no disease progression. Median time to progress from early to intermediate stage was 32 months in Caucasians and 36 months in Indians (p = 0.847). Progression to advanced stage occurred after 51 and 69.5 months, respectively (p = 0.497). Survival analysis showed no significant differences in progression based on gender, ethnicity, or diabetes mellitus status.
Conclusion:
Structural progression in type 2 MacTel is slow and comparable across Caucasian and Indian cohorts over long-term follow up. Further studies to compare the influence of systemic and environmental conditions across different ethnicities will help understand pathogenesis of MacTel.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Longitudinal Studies
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Longitudinal Research
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

