Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Palatable Western-style Cafeteria Diet as a Reliable Method for Modeling Diet-induced Obesity in Rodents
Published on: November 1, 2019
Are Restaurant Health-Related Corporate Social Responsibility Commitments Associated With Nutritional Changes to Menu
Megan P Mueller1, Jason Wang2, May C Wang3
1Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Introduction:
This study aimed to evaluate the associations between health-related corporate social responsibility commitments and the nutrition quality of menu offerings in 66 U.S.-based restaurant chains in 2012-2018.
Methods:
Data on health-related corporate social responsibility (from n=4,096 web text sections) and menu items (n=124,110) were abstracted from the WayBack Machine and MenuStat databases in 2020 and analyzed 2020-2023. Generalized linear mixed models evaluated differences in menu nutrition quality (adapted Nutrition Environment Measures Study in Restaurants score) and the nutrient content of menu items (kcal, total fat, saturated fat, sugar, sodium, and fiber) between restaurants with and without health-related corporate social responsibility, including yearly trends. Exploratory analyses tested differences among new menu items only (n=28,387).
Results:
There were no differences in the adapted Nutrition Environment Measures Study in Restaurants score of menus between restaurants with and without health-related corporate social responsibility. However, restaurants with health-related corporate social responsibility offered menu items with slightly lower calories (352.9 vs 364.1 kcals), total fat (15.3 vs 16.0 g), saturated fat (5.8 vs 6.1 g), sugar (22.5 vs 23.8 g), sodium (571.3 vs 621.6 mg), and fiber (1.8 vs 1.9 g) than restaurants without health-related corporate social responsibility (p<0.05). Among only new menu items, restaurants with health-related corporate social responsibility offered new items that were lower in calories, total fat, saturated fat, sodium, and sugar in 2012. However, the nutrient content for these new menu items also became less healthful over time: +17.8 kcal per year (95% CI=11.1, 24.4), +0.8 g total fat per year (95% CI=0.4, 1.2), +0.4 g saturated fat per year (95% CI=0.1, 0.8), +30.7 mg sodium per year (95% CI=15.0, 46.4), and +1.1g sugar per year (95% CI=0.4, 1.8).
Conclusions:
Health-related corporate social responsibility commitments were associated with small differences in the nutrient content of some menu items but did not translate into meaningful improvements in overall nutrition quality of restaurant offerings. Stronger industry initiatives and policy action are needed to improve the nutrition quality of restaurant menu offerings.
Related Concept Videos
Dietary Connections
Regulation of Food Intake
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:

