Cross sectional analysis of long-term overall survival among patients taking immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs

Alyson Haslam1, Timothée Olivier2, Vinay Prasad1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Journal of Cancer Policy
|November 21, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Few immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) oncology trials report long-term survival data. Incentivizing the collection and reporting of this data is crucial for assessing the true value of these transformative cancer therapies.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Clinical Trial Analysis

Background:

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment.
  • However, comprehensive data on long-term survival outcomes from ICI therapies remain limited.
  • Understanding long-term survival is critical for evaluating the full impact of these treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the availability and patterns of long-term overall survival (OS) data in oncology clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • To assess the correlation between patient survival metrics and the duration of patient at-risk status in these trials.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on US FDA oncology ICI drug approvals from 2011 to 2023.
  • Data from supporting registration trials were examined for participant survival percentages at 12, 24, 36, and 60 months.
  • The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Value Framework Tail of the Curve calculation was used, alongside correlation analysis.

Main Results:

  • Out of 88 approvals, only 20 (22.7%) qualified for the ASCO tail of the curve bonus.
  • A significant proportion of studies failed to report OS at key time points: 30.7% at 12 months, 50.0% at 24 months, 68.2% at 36 months, and 88.6% at 60 months.
  • No significant correlation was found between the longest time with 10% of patients at-risk and the difference in survival percentages (R²=0.1, p=0.30). The median longest time with at least 10% of participants at-risk was 30 months.

Conclusions:

  • The majority of registration trials for immune checkpoint inhibitor oncology therapies lack comprehensive long-term overall survival data.
  • There is a need to incentivize the collection and reporting of long-term survival data to better assess the value of these drugs.
  • Improved reporting standards are necessary for a complete understanding of ICI therapy efficacy in the long term.

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
633
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
541