Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
Prognostic value of manual and digital PD-L1 expression in pT3 and pT4 colon cancer
Dea Natalie Munch Jepsen1,2, Marianne Bøgevang Jensen1, Astrid Louise Bjørn Bennedsen2
1Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Background:
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a prognostic marker in several malignancies, but the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) is inconclusive. Lack of standardized scoring systems for PD-L1 evaluation in CRC has led to inconsistent findings. This exploratory study aimed to evaluate PD-L1 expression using manual and digital methods and correlate the results to overall survival (OS) in a cohort of patients with pT3 and pT4 colon cancer (CC).
Methods:
From a previously published study, 162 patients with pT3 and pT4 CC were included. One tumor slide representing the invasive margin was selected and stained for PD-L1 (22C3). PD-L1 was evaluated according to the tumor proportion score (TPS), the immune cell score (ICS), and the combined positive score (CPS). Additionally, a digital algorithm for detecting PD-L1 positive cells was developed. The manual and digital PD-L1 expression scores were correlated to OS in the entire cohort, and in subgroups according to mismatch repair (MMR) status.
Results:
Only 1 case was classified with a TPS of ≥ 1%. The ICS was classified as < 1%, 1-9%, and ≥ 10% in 66%, 30.2% and 3.7% of the tumors, respectively. The CPS was classified as < 1, 1-9, and ≥ 10 in 82.7%, 15.4%, and 1.9% of the tumors, respectively. A high digital PD-L1 expression score was an independent prognostic factor for longer OS, adjusted for age, pT-category and adjuvant chemotherapy (aHR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.19-0.86, p = 0.018). In the pMMR subgroup, both a CPS ≥ 1 and a high digital score were significantly associated with longer OS in the multivariate analyses (aHR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.06-0.99, p = 0.049, and aHR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.12-0.97, p = 0.043, respectively).
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that high PD-L1 expression is associated with longer OS. In future studies examining PD-L1 expression as a prognostic biomarker in CC, assessing PD-L1 expression using a digital approach or the CPS can be recommended.
More Related Videos
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
09:32Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
Published on: February 8, 2018