Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Cross-sectional comparison of cardiovascular risk scores in people with HIV
Maria Hernandez-Pereira1, Juan Du1,2, Jade Soldado-Folgado2,3
1Medicine and Life Sciences Department (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores show poor agreement in people with HIV, potentially underestimating risk. This highlights the need for HIV-specific risk prediction tools for accurate CVD assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
Background:
- People with HIV face elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
- General population CVD risk scores may underestimate risk in this cohort.
- Accurate risk assessment is crucial for preventative strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the concordance of five CVD risk prediction models in people with HIV.
- To compare risk category distribution across different models.
- To identify the most suitable risk assessment tools for this population.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study of 246 participants (aged 18-75) in Barcelona, Spain.
- Calculation of 10-year CVD risk using SCORE2, REGICOR, REGICOR 3.0, D:A:D reduced, and D:A:D full models.
- Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, Bonferroni correction, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland-Altman analysis.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in risk category distribution across models (p < 0.001).
- High-risk classification varied widely: REGICOR 3.0 (44.4%) and D:A:D full (41.9%) identified more very high-risk individuals than REGICOR (66.2% low-risk).
- Concordance was highest between D:A:D models (CCC=0.82) and poor (<0.5) between most general population and HIV-specific models, with systematic bias noted.
Conclusions:
- Existing cardiovascular risk scores demonstrate limited concordance and interchangeability in people with HIV.
- Discrepancies underscore the inadequacy of general population models for this cohort.
- Validated, HIV-adapted tools are essential for precise CVD risk assessment in people with HIV.
Introduction:
People with HIV have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite this, commonly used CVD risk scores have been developed for the general population, which may underestimate risk in people with HIV. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of five risk prediction models (SCORE2, REGICOR, REGICOR 3.0, D:A:D reduced and D:A:D full) in a cohort of people with HIV.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study enrolled 246 participants aged 18-75 at a single centre in Barcelona, Spain. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected to calculate 10-year CVD risk using each model. Risk categories were compared using a chi-square test followed by a post hoc analysis with Bonferroni's correction for multiple comparisons. Concordance was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and agreement was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis.
Results:
The risk category distribution differed significantly across models (χ2 = 53.6, df = 12; p < 0.001). REGICOR classified most individuals as low-risk (66.2%), whereas REGICOR 3.0 and D:A:D full identified more as very high-risk (44.4% and 41.9%, respectively). Concordance was highest between D:A:D full and reduced (CCC = 0.82), good between SCORE2 and REGICOR (CCC = 0.78) and poor between most HIV-specific and general population models (CCC < 0.5). Bland-Altman analyses revealed systematic bias, particularly between REGICOR and D:A:D full.
Conclusions:
Cardiovascular risk scores showed limited concordance and poor interchangeability in people with HIV. The discrepancies between the general population and HIV-specific models highlight the need for validated and HIV-adapted tools to accurately assess CVD risk in this population.
More Related Videos
07:29Cell-free Biochemical Fluorometric Enzymatic Assay for High-throughput Measurement of Lipid Peroxidation in High Density Lipoprotein
Published on: October 12, 2017
05:53Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System III: Serum Lipid Profile
Serum lipids are fats and fatty substances in the blood and are crucial for various bodily functions, including energy storage, cellular structure, and hormone production. Serum lipids consist of cholesterol, triglycerides, and phospholipids.
Cholesterol is a soft, fat-like substance found in all body cells. It is crucial for producing hormones, vitamin D, and substances that aid...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures