Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
Published on: April 9, 2019
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using targeted MRI-informed microultrasound biopsy
Allison B Forrest1, Danielle E Kruse1, Brian Calio2
1Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Objectives:
This study compares the rate of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-informed microultrasound-guided (microUS) biopsy to historical published data using mpMRI-ultrasound (mpMRI-US) fusion biopsy at the same institution.
Materials And Methods:
A single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent mpMRI-informed microultrasound-guided (microUS) biopsy was performed. Positive predictive value (PPV) of targeted lesions by PI-RADS and PRI-MUS (Prostate Risk Identification Using Microultrasound) was calculated and compared to published data using an mpMRI-US fusion platform.
Results:
169 subjects and 244 total lesions were identified by mpMRI. 44/244 (18.0%), 167/244 (68.4%), and 33/244 (13.5%) were PI-RADS 5, 4, and 3, respectively. 206/244 (84.4%) lesions seen on mpMRI were identified on microUS. 26 additional lesions were identified by microUS only. PCa was identified in 120/169 (71.0%) patients, and csPCa was identified in 70/169 (41.4%) by targeted microUS-guided biopsy of MRI lesions. Targeted biopsy of lesions seen only on microUS added three cases of csPCa (73/169, 43.2%). PPV of targeted PI-RADS 5, 4, and 3 lesions for all PCa and csPCa was 0.80, 0.61, and 0.39, and 0.64, 0.31, and 0.12, respectively. Findings were not significantly different compared to historical data using mpMRI-US fusion biopsy (p > 0.05). PPV for csPCa was 0.18 for mpMRI lesions when no correlate was identified by microUS, compared to 0.37 for lesions when a correlate was seen (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
This retrospective study demonstrates successful implementation of microUS-guided biopsy, with similar rates of identification of csPCa compared to historical data using mpMRI-US fusion.
Key Points:
Question There is limited real-world comparison of the rate of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using mpMRI-informed microUS-guided biopsy compared to historical mpMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy. Findings Identification of clinically significant prostate cancer by microUS-guided biopsy was similar to mpMRI-US fusion biopsy, suggesting microUS-guided biopsy performs as well as mpMRI-US fusion biopsy. Clinical relevance Our study shows the complementary role of mpMRI and microUS for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, supporting the combined approach of these techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

