Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
CT colonography for assessing visceral obesity: clinical utility beyond colorectal screening
Hidekazu Takahashi1, Takahiro Mihara2, Aiko Uchida1
1Boston Medical Sciences, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Purpose:
Visceral obesity is a significant health risk, and the visceral fat area (VFA) measured on CT is a reliable indicator. The current study investigated whether the CT colonography (CTC)-derived VFA can identify visceral obesity, accounting for imaging variations due to colonic insufflation.
Methods:
We retrospectively included patients who underwent both abdominal CT and CTC within 30 days. The waist circumference, VFA, and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were measured at the umbilical and L1-L5 vertebral levels. Visceral obesity was defined as a VFA ≥ 100 cm² at the umbilical level on CT. The diagnostic performances of the CTC-derived VFA, BMI, and waist circumference were compared. In a secondary analysis, regression models were constructed to estimate the CT-derived VFA from the CTC measurements. Model performance was evaluated via 5-fold cross-validation and quantified with the mean absolute error (MAE).
Results:
Fifty-eight patients were included (median age 51.0 years, IQR 43.0-58.8; 42 males, 16 females). Compared with CT, CTC revealed a significantly greater waist circumference (89.9 vs. 87.5 cm, P < 0.001) and a lower VFA (96.0 vs. 110.3 cm², P = 0.005), whereas there was no significant difference in the SFA. The umbilical slice position remained unchanged in 49 patients (84.5%), and no patient's position shifted by two or more levels. The CTC-derived VFA demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for visceral obesity, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.90 and 0.93. BMI yielded 0.73 and 0.75, and waist circumference 0.90 and 0.79, respectively. Incorporating additional slices (e.g., L2) further reduced the MAE from 19.76 to 16.54 cm² (P = 0.013).
Conclusion:
The CTC-derived VFA was shown to be a viable marker for identifying visceral obesity, thus potentially offering a secondary diagnostic resource without additional radiation exposure or costs. While single-slice models showed reasonable performance, multi-slice models demonstrated greater predictive accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:

