Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026
Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
Frequencies of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current for chronic low back pain: a
Jyun-Jhe Wang1, Yi-No Kang2, Tomáš Kvasnička3
1Department of Medical Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, No. 252, Wuxing St., Xinyi Dist., Taipei City 110301, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Background:
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. Electrotherapy modalities such as high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (HF-TENS), low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (LF-TENS), and interferential current (IFC) are commonly used, yet their comparative effectiveness remains unclear.
Objectives:
This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of HF-TENS, LF-TENS, and IFC on pain relief and functional improvement in people with CLBP.
Methods:
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from database inception to 31 July 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating pain intensity and functional outcomes in adults with CLBP receiving HF-TENS, LF-TENS, or IFC compared to control. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, and methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 and Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. Network meta-analysis employed a random-effects model, with sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessment.
Results:
15 randomized controlled trials were analyzed using a frequentist network meta-analysis. IFC showed the greatest pain reduction (standardized mean difference, SMD -0.96; 95 % confidence interval, CI -1.49 to -0.43) and functional improvement (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI, Mean difference, MD -7.28; Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, RBDQ, MD -3.13) compared to controls. HF-TENS also significantly reduced pain (SMD -0.81), while LF-TENS had a non-significant effect. IFC ranked highest by P-score across outcomes. No significant inconsistency was detected, and sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness.
Conclusions:
This network meta-analysis indicates that IFC and HF-TENS are likely more effective in reducing pain in people with chronic low back pain, with IFC also showing a potential advantage in improving function. These results should be interpreted with caution, given the low certainty of evidence. Nevertheless, the findings provide clinically relevant insights and support further investigation through well-designed, head-to-head trials.
Data Registration:
This review was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD420251000528).
More Related Videos
08:33Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
Published on: January 5, 2024
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
