Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Immunoglobulin Gene Sequence Analysis In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: From Patient Material To Sequence Interpretation
Published on: November 26, 2018
Venetoclax and ibrutinib: Two partners for the front-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Francesca R Mauro1, Alessandro Cellini1, Francesco Angotzi1
1Hematology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Abstract:
The combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax (I+V), has shown benefit in treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) due to their complementary mechanisms of action and synergistic effects. The fixed duration of the I+V regimen results in high response rates, including undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD), in treatment-naïve patients with CLL, even among those with high-risk abnormalities. Additionally, the efficacy of the I+V combination is being currently evaluated in an MRD-guided approach, where treatment continues until a deep response with undetectable MRD (uMRD) is achieved. This review analyzes data from 7 clinical trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of the I+V regimen when administered as a first-line treatment in at least 50 patients, either in a fixed-duration schedule (CAPTIVATE and GLOW trials) or in an MRD-guided manner (MDACC, FLAIR, ERADIC, and HOVON NEXT STEP trials). Despite variations in patient characteristics, treatment protocols, follow-up durations, and treatment lengths, the I+V combination led to high response rates (% range, 81-97) and undetectable MRD (% range, 52-82) with high progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The MRD-guided treatment yields promising results, with high rates of deep responses and prolonged PFS, even in patients with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IGHV) genes (3-year PFS: 90 % in the MDACC trial and 98 % in the FLAIR trial) and in those with TP53 disruptions (3-year PFS: 86.1 % in the MDACC trial). The I+V regimen is generally manageable and well-tolerated, with toxicities consistent with those reported for single-agent use. Nonetheless, concerns regarding cardiovascular toxicities have been raised, particularly among older patients.
More Related Videos
14:04Neutrophil Isolation and Analysis to Determine their Role in Lymphoma Cell Sensitivity to Therapeutic Agents
Published on: March 25, 2016
09:34Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...