Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Impact of Model Parameterisation and Variance Component Estimates on Genomic Predictions of Carcass Traits in Montana
Caroline Assis Almeida1, Felipe Eguti de Carvalho1, Flávia Cristina Bis1
1Faculty of Zootechnics and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract:
This study evaluated the influence of variance component (VC) estimates, obtained from different models and two relationship matrices, pedigree-based (BLUP) and genomic information-based (ssGBLUP), on genomic predictions of carcass traits in Montana composite cattle. Phenotypic records from 14,422 animals were analysed for ribeye area, rump fat thickness, backfat thickness and marbling, along with pedigree information from 193,129 animals and genomic data from 3911 animals genotyped with 49,457 SNPs. Variance components and heritability estimates were calculated using restricted maximum likelihood under single-trait linear models. Across five models (M1-M5), fixed effects included contemporary group, embryo transfer, age at ultrasound and cow age at calving, while random effects included direct genetic effect and residual. From model M2 onwards, biological type, heterosis and both combined and specific recombination effects were also considered. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to identify the best-fitting model. Different VC estimates were applied in ssGBLUP predictions to evaluate predictive ability based on accuracy, bias and dispersion. Variance component and heritability estimates were similar between methods, although ssGBLUP yielded higher direct additive genetic variances and heritabilities. More parameterised models using ssGBLUP provided a better fit according to AIC. However, less parameterised models showed superior predictive ability, regardless of whether VCs were estimated by BLUP or ssGBLUP. When comparing predictive ability across sources, pedigree-based VC estimates resulted in more accurate predictions. Thus, the choice of model complexity should be guided by the analysis objective and the available data structure.
More Related Videos
12:31In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
Published on: August 24, 2013
07:46Author Spotlight: Improving Beef Cattle Nutrition and Production with a Focus on Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality Traits Through Advanced Biochemical and Molecular Assays
Published on: July 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Heritability
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Multiple Allele Traits