Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Predictive value of different long-term (10-year) blood pressure parameters variability in cardiovascular disease: A
Yixiu Chen1,2, Hongmin Liu1, Mo Zhang1,3
1Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital Affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Insights
Increased blood pressure variability, including systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP), independently raises cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. SBP variability offers the most significant improvement in predicting CVD risk within the China-PAR model.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Long-term blood pressure variability is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in cardiovascular health.
- Understanding the independent predictive value of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP) variability is crucial for risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive capabilities of long-term SBP, DBP, and PP variability for incident cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).
- To evaluate the incremental predictive value of blood pressure variability when integrated into the established China-PAR risk prediction model.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study involving 44,938 participants was conducted.
- Participants were stratified into quartiles based on SBP, DBP, and PP variability over a 10-year period.
- Cox proportional hazards regression and the China-PAR model were utilized to assess CVD risk prediction.
Main Results:
- Higher quartiles of SBP, DBP, and PP variability were associated with significantly increased CVD risk (HRs ranging from 1.25 to 1.33 compared to the lowest quartile).
- Incorporating SBP, DBP, and PP variability into the China-PAR model improved its predictive accuracy, with SBP variability showing the greatest enhancement (C-indices 0.6866, 0.6787, 0.6822 respectively).
- A significant interaction between age and blood pressure variability was observed for all measures.
Conclusions:
- Elevated long-term variability in SBP, DBP, and PP independently predicts higher CVD risk, irrespective of average blood pressure levels.
- Systolic blood pressure variability demonstrates the strongest capacity to improve CVD risk prediction within the China-PAR model.
- Blood pressure variability is a critical, independent risk factor for cardiovascular events.
Background And Objective:
We aimed to compare the predictive value of long-term variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP) over a 10-year period for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).
Methods:
A prospective cohort of 44,938 participants were categorized into four groups based on the quartiles of variability of SBP, DBP, and PP. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to assess the impact of SBP, DBP, and PP variability on CVDs. The predictive value of SBP, DBP, and PP variability for CVDs and specific cardiovascular outcomes was evaluated based on the China-PAR model.
Results:
During a mean follow-up period of 5.04 years, compared to the Q1, the HR and 95 %CI of CVDs was 1.28 (1.11,1.48) in the Q4 of SBP, 1.33 (1.17,1.51) in the Q4 of DBP, and 1.25 (1.06,1.47) in the Q4 of PP (all P < 0.01). When incorporated into the China-PAR model, the C-index for SBP, DBP, and PP variability in predicting CVDs were 0.6866, 0.6787, and 0.6822, with SBP variability offering the strongest predictive improvement to the China-PAR model. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant interaction between age and SBP, DBP, and PP variability (P < 0.01).
Conclusion:
Increases in SBP, DBP, and PP variability independently elevate the risk of CVDs and its subtypes, regardless of absolute blood pressure levels. Furthermore, SBP, DBP, and PP variability can improve the predictive value of the China-PAR model for CVDs risk, with SBP variability demonstrating the strongest predictive capacity.
Related Concept Videos
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

