Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

11:34
Building Up a High-throughput Screening Platform to Assess the Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancers
Published on: December 5, 2017
13.0K
Real-World Benchmarking and Validation of Foundation Model Transformers for Endometrial Cancer Subtyping from
Vincent M Wagner1, Casey M Cosgrove2, Stephanie J Chen1
1University of Iowa.
Research Square
|November 24, 2025
Summary
Open-source foundation models accurately classify endometrial cancer (EC) molecular subtypes from whole-slide images (WSIs). These advanced models outperform traditional CNNs in real-world validation, offering a scalable tool for precision oncology.
Area of Science:
- Digital pathology
- Computational oncology
- Artificial intelligence in medicine
Background:
- Endometrial cancer (EC) molecular subtyping is crucial for treatment selection.
- Accurate subtyping from whole-slide images (WSIs) using artificial intelligence (AI) can improve diagnostic efficiency.
- Current methods may not fully leverage the potential of advanced AI models for histopathology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate open-source foundation models with attention-based multiple instance learning (MIL) for classifying EC molecular subtypes from WSIs.
- To assess the performance and generalizability of these models in an independent, real-world cohort.
- To compare foundation models against traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs).
Main Methods:
- Assembled public (n=815) and external (n=720) EC cohorts with molecular subtyping.
- Benchmarked four CNNs and six open-source foundation encoders using TransMIL and CLAM MIL strategies within the STAMP pipeline.
- Trained models with cross-validation and evaluated on the independent cohort, using macro-area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as the primary outcome.
Main Results:
- Foundation models outperformed CNNs in cross-validation (macro-AUC 0.799-0.860 vs 0.715-0.829).
- The best configuration (Virchow2 with CLAM) achieved a cross-validation macro-AUC of 0.860.
- In external validation, foundation models showed higher discrimination (macro-AUC 0.667-0.780) compared to CNNs, with UNI2 and Virchow2 models demonstrating strong performance.
Conclusions:
- Open-source foundation model pipelines with attention-based MIL accurately and generally classify EC molecular subtypes from WSIs.
- These models surpass CNN performance in real-world validation.
- The findings support the use of these AI tools for scalable, cost-effective precision oncology and molecular testing triage.

