Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
Mobile Objective Diagnostics of Macular Degeneration using Dark-Adapted Visual Evoked Potentials
S Mohammad Ali Banijamali1, Craig Versek1, Kameran Lashkari2
1NeuroFieldz Inc., Newton, MA, USA 02459.
Purpose:
Delayed Dark-Adapted vision Recovery (DAR) is a known biomarker for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD); however, its measurement is often cumbersome for both patients and examiners. In this study, we developed NeuroVEP, a portable, wireless, and user-friendly system designed to objectively assess Dark-Adapted Visual Evoked Potentials (DAVEP).
Methods:
NeuroVEP consists of a headset with a smartphone that delivers controlled photo-bleach and monocular pattern reversal stimuli while utilizing custom electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes and electronics to measure DAVEP. The system allows for separate analysis of the near peripheral and macular visual field of each eye, completing the test in a comfortable, single-session format (<25 minutes) without requiring subjective patient feedback.The NeuroVEP test protocol included: (i) Mesopic luminance pattern reversal VEP for macular and peripheral regions (5 mins), (ii) Full-field photopic pattern reversal VEP (2.5 mins), (iii) Scotopic luminance DAVEP recovery post photo-bleach (up to 15 mins), measured simultaneously from both eyes.The data were analyzed for 66 participants, divided into four cohorts: (A) Age-matched healthy controls with no ophthalmic pathologies (n=10), (B) Early-stage AMD (AREDS1) (n=19), (C) Intermediate-stage AMD (AREDS3) (n=18), (D) Advanced-stage AMD (AREDS4/5) (n=19).Advanced signal processing and machine learning methodologies were applied to filter and process the VEP responses from the DAR segment of the experiment. 13 discriminating features were extracted from the processed signals and classified for each participant using a Bayesian statistical framework and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM).
Results:
The algorithm demonstrated: 86% accuracy in early-stage AMD detection (Healthy vs. Early AMD) (Sensitivity: 97%, Specificity: 65%, AUC-ROC: 0.81 and AUC-PR: 0.92) and 93% accuracy in overall AMD detection (Healthy vs. All AMD stages) (Sensitivity: 98%, Specificity: 65%, AUC-ROC: 0.82 and AUC-PR: 0.97).
Conclusions:
We successfully developed a portable, objective user-friendly VEP system and an advanced Bayesian-GMM statistical analysis framework capable of identifying DAR deficits in AMD patients. This novel technology shows high potential for early AMD detection and could serve as a non-invasive, objective diagnostic tool for AMD screening in clinical and remote settings.

