Estimating white matter hyperintensities volume in individuals with stroke using T1-weighted images

Stroke recovery outcomes vary across individuals, motivating the search for biomarkers that can improve prediction. White matter hyperintensities (WMH) volume is a leading biomarker candidate, with FLAIR MRI typically used for WMH segmentation; however, T1-weighted (T1) MRI is often more available. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of two automated WMH segmentation methods (WMH-SynthSeg and SAMSEG) to determine whether WMH volume can be reliably estimated using T1 alone. We analyzed imaging data from 227 stroke patients across three datasets spanning early subacute to chronic recovery, each with gold-standard WMH masks and stroke lesion masks manually traced on available T1 and FLAIR scans. WMH was segmented using T1 only as input to WMH-SynthSeg and SAMSEG, as well as using both T1 and FLAIR as input to SAMSEG, as previously implemented in stroke recovery research. Automated WMH segmentations were compared to the gold-standard WMH mask: accuracy was assessed using Dice similarity index (SI) and cluster-level false negative ratio, while agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation, Pearson's correlation, and volume ratio. We used linear mixed-effects models to evaluate whether SI was influenced by factors such as WMH volume, stroke lesion volume, WMH contrast, age, sex, and days since stroke, with dataset as a random effect. WMH-SynthSeg using T1-only input produced more accurate and reliable WMH segmentations compared to SAMSEG with T1-only input and performed comparably to SAMSEG using both T1 and FLAIR input. WMH-SynthSeg using T1-only input may be used for WMH volume estimation in stroke recovery research in the absence of multimodal imaging.

WMH volume, often assessed via multimodal imaging, predicts post-stroke outcomesT1-only methods would facilitate WMH analysis if multimodal MRI is unavailableIt is unclear how T1-only methods perform in brains with stroke lesionsWe show T1-based WMH-SynthSeg estimates strongly agree with gold standard methodsAccuracy was stable across stroke lesion sizes but varied with WMH volume/contrast.