Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Measuring the Stiffness of Ex Vivo Mouse Aortas Using Atomic Force Microscopy
Published on: October 19, 2016
Polygenic Determinants of Arterial Stiffness: Implications for Hypertension
Adam D Gepner1,2, Ryan J Pewowaruk1,2,3, Claudia E Korcarz1,2
1William S. Middleton Memorial Veteran's Hospital, Department of Medicine - Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Madison, WI, USA.
Insights
Genetic risk for high blood pressure is linked to load-dependent arterial stiffness, not structural stiffness. Polygenic risk scores for blood pressure predict arterial stiffness components, highlighting distinct genetic influences.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular genetics
- Vascular biology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Arterial stiffness, encompassing structural and load-dependent components, is a key cardiovascular disease risk marker.
- High blood pressure is a significant contributor to load-dependent arterial stiffness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the genetic associations between polygenic risk scores (PRS) for blood pressure (BP) and distinct components of arterial stiffness.
- To differentiate the genetic underpinnings of structural versus load-dependent arterial stiffness.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 5,942 participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
- Calculated total, structural, and load-dependent carotid arterial stiffness from ultrasound data.
- Employed multivariable regression and Mendelian Randomization (MR) to assess associations between BP PRS and arterial stiffness components.
Main Results:
- Polygenic risk scores for systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly associated with total and load-dependent arterial stiffness.
- No significant association was found between blood pressure PRS and structural arterial stiffness.
- Mendelian Randomization confirmed that BP PRS predict mean arterial pressure (MAP), and elevated MAP increased load-dependent stiffness.
Conclusions:
- Genetic factors influencing blood pressure have a differential impact on the components of arterial stiffness.
- Load-dependent arterial stiffness is genetically linked to blood pressure, while structural stiffness is not.
- These findings underscore the distinct genetic etiologies of arterial stiffness mechanisms.
Background:
Components of arterial stiffness (structural stiffness from aging and load-dependent stiffness from high blood pressure) are markers for cardiovascular disease risk. We evaluated relationships between polygenic risk scores (PRS) for blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness.
Methods:
Participants (n=5942) are from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis with measures of carotid ultrasound and genomic DNA. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was calculated from carotid ultrasound representing total stiffness. Structural stiffness was calculated by adjusting PWV to a 120/80 mmHg blood pressure with participant-specific models. Load-dependent stiffness was the difference of total and structural stiffness. Blood pressure PRSs were previously derived from a genome-wide association study. Associations between BP PRSs and components of carotid arterial stiffness were assessed with multivariable-adjusted regression models. Mendelian Randomization (MR) was performed with two-stage least squares to 1) confirm that BP PRSs strongly predict MAP and 2) estimate the effect of MAP on arterial stiffness.
Results:
Participants (n=5,942) were mean (standard deviation) age of 62.8 (10.3) years (52% female; 39% White, 25% African-American, 13% Asian, 23% Hispanic). Systolic BP (SBP) was 133.5 (20.5) mmHg, diastolic BP (DBP) was 74.27 (10.28) mmHg and pulse pressure (PP) was 59.22 (16.17) mmHg. Total carotid stiffness was associated with the SBP PRS (β=0.10 +/- 0.02, p=5.25E-08) and the DBP PRS (β: 0.08 +/- 0.02, p=7.26E-07) but not PP PRS (β=0.04 +/- 0.02, P=0.05). Load dependent carotid stiffness was associated with the SBP PRS β=0.09 +/- 0.01, p=7.93*10-30) the DBP PRS (β=0.09 +/- 0.01, p= 4.92*10-34) and the PP PRS (β=0.03 +/- 0.01, p= 8.18*10-5). Structural carotid stiffness was not associated with any BP PRSs. MR showed that SBP and DPB PRS strongly predict MAP (p<0.001) and each 1-mmHg increase in MAP raised load dependent stiffness by 0.0494 m/s (p<0.001).
Conclusion:
There are key differences in the genetic underpinnings of the mechanistic components of arterial stiffness.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers

