Evaluating the Role of Basiliximab Induction in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation: A Multicenter...

Simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant recipients are considered at lower immunologic risk than kidney-alone recipients, so steroid-only induction is often used. However, some centers continue to include basiliximab induction in their protocols. This study compared graft and infectious outcomes in SLK recipients receiving basiliximab (Bas) induction versus those without basiliximab (No Bas).

Using TriNetX, we conducted a retrospective, propensity-score-matched study of SLK recipients comparing 3-, 6-, and 12-month graft and infectious outcomes. Patients receiving alemtuzumab or anti-thymocyte globulin were excluded; steroid induction was permitted but not required in either cohort. Maintenance immunosuppression included tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone. Cohorts were matched on 71 variables, including demographics, disease etiology, severity markers, and cPRA.

After matching, 292 patients were included per cohort (mean age 56.9 ± 10.1 years; 61% male). Kidney and liver rejection rates were similar. The No Bas cohort had more liver biopsies (25.5% vs. 18.2% at 1 year, p = 0.04). Kidney biopsy, graft failure, re-transplantation, delayed graft function, and mortality were comparable. Liver primary non-function was more frequent in Bas (2.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.04). The No Bas cohort had higher CMV at 3 months (13.4% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.008) and higher EBV at all time points (4.0% vs. 0.4% at 1 year, p = 0.004).

SLK recipients without basiliximab induction had comparable rejection outcomes but more viral infections, potentially from greater steroid exposure, and more liver biopsies, which may reflect higher clinical suspicion for rejection or incomplete capture of rejection events in EMR data.