Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026

10:49
Planar and Three-Dimensional Printing of Conductive Inks
Published on: December 9, 2011
37.7K
Acoustic printing of conductive polymers
Ethan Trepka1,2, Lauren Cooper1,3, Kenneth Brinson1,4
1Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Summary
Researchers developed new ultrasound-based printing methods to fabricate conductive polymers within biological tissues. These novel temperature- and pressure-based techniques enable precise bioelectronic interface construction in optically opaque environments.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Bioelectronics
- Medical Device Fabrication
Background:
- Fabricating materials within optically opaque structures like biological tissue presents significant challenges.
- Ultrasound-based printing (sonoprinting) offers a promising solution, but its application to conductive materials remains unexplored.
- This limitation hinders the development of advanced bioelectronic applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend sonoprinting capabilities to conductive materials.
- To develop novel methods for polymerizing conductive polymers using focused ultrasound (FUS).
- To enable the fabrication of bioelectronic interfaces within optically opaque biological environments.
Main Methods:
- Designed temperature-based and pressure-based methods for conductive polymer polymerization using FUS.
- Temperature-based method utilizes acoustic attenuation for localized heating.
- Pressure-based method employs acoustic vaporization of perfluorohexane double emulsions to initiate polymerization.
Main Results:
- Successfully demonstrated sonoprinting of the conductive polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT).
- Achieved high spatial resolution printing through optically opaque hydrogels and biological tissue.
- Validated both temperature- and pressure-based approaches for conductive material fabrication.
Conclusions:
- Established complementary temperature- and pressure-based sonoprinting methods for conductive polymers.
- Paved the way for fabricating complex bioelectronic interfaces directly within biological tissues.
- Opened new avenues for in-situ bioelectronic device construction and repair.
Related Concept Videos
Cationic Chain-Growth Polymerization: Mechanism
The cationic polymerization mechanism consists of three steps: initiation, propagation, and termination. In the initiation step of the polymerization process, the π bond of a monomer gets protonated by the Lewis acid catalyst, which is formed from boron trifluoride and water. The protonation of the π bond generates a carbocation stabilized by the electron‐donating group. In the propagation step, the π bond of the second monomer acts as a nucleophile and attacks the generated carbocation,...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

