Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

The Creation of a Rat Model for Osteosarcopenia via Ovariectomy
Published on: February 21, 2025
Sarcopenic obesity prevalence and clinical implications in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis and class
K Godziuk1, F T Vieira2, M Forhan3
1Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Objective:
Individuals with advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) and a larger body size are at risk for sarcopenic obesity (SO), an unfavourable condition of high fat and low muscle mass and function that markedly impacts mobility and morbidity. We examined the prevalence and implications of SO in adults with knee OA and a BMI ≥35 kg/m2, comparing various established diagnostic criteria.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of participants at baseline from the POMELO [Prevention of MusclE Loss in Osteoarthritis] pilot randomized clinical trial. The diagnosis of SO was based on published criteria, identifying the co-presence of low muscle function, low muscle mass, and high fat mass. Assessments included maximal handgrip strength (absolute and relative to body size), chair sit-to-stands, muscle [appendicular lean soft tissue] and fat mass measured by DXA, health-related quality of life by Euroqol EQ-5D, and physical function by 6-min walk (6MWT) and Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).
Results:
Out of 50 adults (74 % female, 63.7 ± 6.9 years, BMI 42.1 ± 4.6 kg/m2), 28 % had criteria for SO (95%CI 15.5-40.4). Individuals with SO had shorter 6MWT distance, -78.6 m (p = 0.012), worse WOMAC function score, 7.2 (p = 0.046), and lower EQ-5D visual analog score, -14.7 (p = 0.016), compared to those without SO.
Conclusion:
SO was present in 28 % (95%CI 15.5-40.4) of our sample with knee OA, with clinically unfavourable implications on measured and self-reported physical function and quality of life. Identification of SO may better stratify patients and enable personalized support to preserve muscle mass and function prior to weight loss or arthroplasty considerations.
More Related Videos
13:35Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
Published on: March 21, 2021
07:22Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Obesity
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Absorption and Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Metabolism and Excretion
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...