Compliance with ESAIC guidelines for fibrinogen concentrate prescription in cardiac surgery: a multicentre French

Dan Longrois1, Pierre Albaladejo2, Damien Bedague2

  • 1Departement of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, DMU (Département Médico-Universitaire) PARABOL, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris Cité, INSERM 1140, Paris, France.

BMC Anesthesiology
|November 25, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Fibrinogen concentrate use in cardiac surgery varies by center, but compliance with European guidelines is high at 86.5%. Non-compliance, mainly over-prescription, did not significantly impact patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Hematology

Background:

  • Fibrinogen concentrate may reduce blood transfusions in cardiac surgery patients with bleeding.
  • The European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) provides guidelines for its use.
  • Compliance with these ESAIC guidelines in clinical practice has not been previously studied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate adherence to ESAIC guidelines for fibrinogen concentrate prescription in adult cardiac surgery patients.
  • To assess the primary endpoint of guideline compliance percentage.
  • To investigate secondary endpoints including in-hospital mortality and hospital length-of-stay.

Main Methods:

  • A multicentre observational cohort study involving 13 French cardiac surgery centers.
  • Recruitment of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from March 2017 to April 2018.
  • Compliance defined by appropriate fibrinogen administration during hypofibrinogenemia and bleeding, or non-administration when criteria were not met.

Main Results:

  • Out of 2,649 patients, 374 (14.1%) received fibrinogen concentrate, with significant center-to-center prescription rate variation (p < 0.001).
  • Overall compliance with ESAIC guidelines was high at 86.5%, largely due to appropriate non-prescription in many cases.
  • Non-compliance (13.5%) was more frequent due to over-prescription (241 patients) than under-prescription (117 patients).

Conclusions:

  • Despite significant variation in fibrinogen concentrate prescription rates across centers, overall compliance with ESAIC guidelines is high.
  • Non-compliance, primarily driven by over-prescription, was not associated with increased in-hospital deaths or longer hospital stays.
  • These findings suggest that current practice largely aligns with guidelines, and deviations may not lead to adverse outcomes.
Abstract