The double burden: co-occurrence of malaria and anaemia in children under five in Ghana - a multilevel mixed-effects

Julius Kwabena Karikari1,2, Kweku Bedu-Addo3, Yahye Sheikh Abdulle Hassan4

  • 1University Hospital, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box PMB KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana. juliuskarikari@gmail.com.

BMC Pediatrics
|November 25, 2025
PubMed

Insights

The co-occurrence of malaria and anaemia affects 6.4% of Ghanaian children under five. Risk factors include fever and birth order, while household wealth and parental education play a role in this double burden.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Tropical Medicine

Background:

  • Malaria and anaemia frequently co-occur in children under five, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
  • This co-occurrence is a significant contributor to childhood morbidity and mortality globally.
  • Ghana faces a substantial public health challenge due to this double burden.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate the prevalence of the co-occurrence of malaria and anaemia (double burden) in Ghanaian children under five.
  • To identify risk factors associated with this double burden.
  • To inform targeted public health interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey.
  • Employed mixed-effects multilevel binary logistic regression models to identify risk factors.
  • Illustrated regional prevalence variations using a choropleth map.

Main Results:

  • The prevalence of the double burden was 6.4% (95% CI: 5.5-7.5).
  • Associated factors included higher birth order, recent fever, and lower maternal education.
  • Children in wealthier households and those with older household heads showed reduced odds of the double burden.

Conclusions:

  • The double burden of malaria and anaemia remains a critical health issue for Ghanaian children under five.
  • While malaria prevalence may decrease, anaemia persists at high levels.
  • Integrated interventions focusing on malaria prevention, nutrition, and anaemia control are crucial, especially in high-burden areas.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
Factors Affecting Illness01:18

Factors Affecting Illness

When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is: