From lived experience to leadership: establishing a stakeholder advisory board to guide first-episode psychosis research and services
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
B Priyadharshni1,2, S Jagadeesan3,4, Krishna Priya1
1Schizophrenia Research Foundation (SCARF), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Background:
Advisory boards incorporating people with lived experience (PWLE) with psychosis substantially enhance first-episode psychosis (FEP) services. This study aimed to develop an advisory board including persons with lived experience (PWLE) and different stakeholders, specifically for first-episode psychosis.
Objective:
To develop and pilot test a first-episode psychosis advisory board involving people with lived experience (PWLE), caregivers, and different stakeholders.
Methodology:
This research employed a two-phase exploratory approach and mixed method: Phase 1, with critical analysis of existing manuals on advisory board development, in-depth interviews with professionals from different backgrounds, co-design & manual development and manual evaluation. Phase 2 consists of piloting the advisory board by recruiting the members, training and piloting the board via the developed manual and finally evaluating the developed advisory board.
Results:
Phase 1 analysis, based on in-depth interviews with 19 stakeholders, revealed limited initial awareness of advisory boards. The manual was developed by adapting 2 manuals (screened from 10) and incorporating expert insights. A panel of 10 experts evaluated the manual, yielding a high overall content validity score of 83.8%, with strong scores in General Feedback (86.0%) and Content Assessment (84.7%). For Phase 2, 13 members (selected from 75 applicants) were recruited. Following a 6-month, 12-session pilot, focus groups with all 13 members emphasized the importance of training, structured processes, and effective communication.
Conclusion:
This study addresses a critical gap by developing an inclusive advisory board using a multi-pronged approach. The findings underscore the value of a multifaceted approach. Future research should utilize established frameworks to assess board effectiveness and sustainability, ultimately strengthening FEP services. This pioneering manual serves as a template for healthcare institutions to establish advisory boards that integrate diverse stakeholders, including those with lived experiences of psychosis.
Clinical Trial Number:
Not applicable.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Ethics in Research