Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026
Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model
Published on: August 17, 2022
Operator and Patient Injuries From Tacker Dislodgement During Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation: A Retrospective Study
Tsia-Shu Lo1,2,3,4, Louiza Erika Rellora5, Chien-Chien Yu1
1Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Linkou, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Objective:
To identify the factors contributing to tacker dislodgement and associated complications during sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF) procedures.
Design:
Retrospective study.
Setting:
Tertiary medical center.
Population:
Six hundred and seventy-six patients with stage ≥ 3 pelvic organ prolapse (POP) who underwent SSF with anchor-based devices (tackers) between April 2018 and November 2023.
Methods:
Of these, 657 underwent SSF with transvaginal mesh (Surelift: 463; Calistar-S: 194), and 19 underwent SSF with Anchorsure alone. Patients were grouped into secure (n = 649) and dislodged tacker (n = 27) groups. Standardised institutional protocols, included pre-operative assessments, validated Chinese questionnaires at baseline and follow-up at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
Main Outcome Measures:
Determine the occurrence of a tacker dislodge during application and the injury caused to the patient and the operator.
Results:
Tacker dislodgement occurred in 2.2% of the cases. The dislodged group had a significantly higher BMI (p < 0.001) and prevalence of hypertension (p = 0.004). Complications in this group included two bladder injuries and four operator injuries, including glove tears and finger cuts (p < 0.001). The secure group demonstrated significantly less blood loss than the non-secure group (p < 0.001). Objective and subjective cure rates were high and comparable between the groups: 95.5% and 94.4% for the secure group and 90% for the dislodged group. The quality of life and sexual function outcomes were similarly favourable.
Conclusion:
SSF using a tacker-based device was safe and effective. Recognising the risks associated with tacker dislodgement can enhance preparedness and minimise complications for both patients and operators.
