Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

A Simple Approach to Induce Experimental Autoimmune Neuritis in C57BL/6 Mice for Functional and Neuropathological Assessments
Published on: November 9, 2017
Intravenous Efgartigimod or Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Guillain-Barre Syndrome: An Observational Multicenter Study
Heting Cai1, Fan Zhou2, Tao Li3
1Huashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Background And Aims:
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute autoimmune polyradiculoneuropathy characterized by progressive flaccid paralysis. The standard treatments include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PE), with limited accessibility to these treatments. Efgartigimod is an FcRn antagonist that reduces IgG levels, similar to PE, serving as a potential alternative. This study aims to compare the efficacy of Efgartigimod with standard IVIg in GBS.
Methods:
This was a multicenter observational study in China. Eligible participants were aged ≥ 16 years, meeting the diagnostic criteria for GBS, and presented with a GBS Disability Scale score ≤ 5 at baseline assessment. Participants received efgartigimod (10 mg/kg per week up to 4 doses) or IVIg (2 g/kg once). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 1, and week 2 post-treatment, and at the last follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants improving at least 1 point on the GBS-DS.
Results:
Between January and October 2024, 22 GBS patients were enrolled, including 11 in each group. At week 1, 14 patients improved in GBS-DS, with 7 (63.6%) in the efgartigimod group and 7 (63.6%) in the IVIg group. Median time to improvement was 4 days in the efgartigimod group and 8 days in the IVIg group. At week 2, GBS-DS response rates were 90.9% (10/11) for efgartigimod and 81.8% (9/11) for IVIg.
Interpretation:
Based on our preliminary findings, intravenous efgartigimod may be potentially tolerated in GBS over the short term. However, this study cannot establish comparative efficacy given the methodological limitations, and large-scale well-controlled head-to-head trials remain imperative.
More Related Videos
09:46Rat Model of Widespread Cerebral Cortical Demyelination Induced by an Intracerebral Injection of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines
Published on: September 21, 2021
10:35Assessment of Antibody-based Drugs Effects on Murine Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Macrophage Activation
Published on: December 26, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which...
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Antiepileptic Drugs: Potassium Channel Activators
Ezogabine has gained approval as an adjunctive treatment...