Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Intervention for De Novo Acute Myocardial Infarction
Ae-Young Her1, Sunwon Kim2, Dong Oh Kang3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Insights
Drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) showed better outcomes than drug-eluting stents (DES). DCB PCI significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events, revascularization, and bleeding in AMI patients over two years.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomaterials in Medicine
Background:
- Limited data exists on drug-coated balloon (DCB) use in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment for AMI.
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) are commonly used in PCI, but alternatives are being explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCB revascularization compared to conventional PCI with second-generation DES in patients with de novo AMI.
- To assess long-term clinical outcomes, including net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE), target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 329 patients with de novo AMI treated with DCB-based PCI.
- Propensity score-matched comparison with patients undergoing conventional PCI using DES from a registry.
- Two-year follow-up to compare NACE rates between the DCB and DES groups.
Main Results:
- DCB-based PCI showed significantly lower cumulative incidences of NACE (6.2% vs. 10.8%), target vessel revascularization (1.7% vs. 5.7%), and major bleeding (0.8% vs. 3.2%) compared to DES-only PCI after 2 years.
- These findings were consistent across various statistical adjustment methods, including multivariable regression, propensity score matching, and inverse probability of treatment weighting.
- DCB-based PCI was independently associated with a reduced risk of 2-year NACE, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding.
Conclusions:
- DCB-based PCI demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional DES-only PCI in patients with de novo AMI at 2-year follow-up.
- DCB-based PCI represents a safe and effective alternative for selected AMI patients with optimal pre-dilation.
- Further prospective studies may confirm these findings and establish DCB as a primary treatment option for de novo AMI.
Purpose:
Data on drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are limited. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of DCB revascularization in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with de novo AMI.
Materials And Methods:
Three hundred twenty-nine patients with de novo AMI who were successfully treated with DCB-based PCI were retrospectively enrolled. Patients treated with DCB-based PCI were compared to propensity score-matched patients who underwent conventional PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES), using data from a DES registry. Both groups were followed over 2 years to assess net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE).
Results:
The cumulative incidences of NACE [6.2% vs. 10.8%; hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval, CI): 0.54 (0.33-0.88); p=0.014], target vessel revascularization [1.7% vs. 5.7%; HR (95% CI): 0.33 (0.13-0.80); p=0.014], and major bleeding [0.8% vs. 3.2%; HR (95% CI): 0.21 (0.05-0.83); p=0.027] were significantly lower in the DCB-based group compared to the DES-only group after 2 years of follow-up. These results remained consistent after adjusting for baseline differences using multivariable regression, propensity score matching, and inverse probability of treatment weighting. In a multivariable model, DCB-based PCI was independently associated with reduced risk of 2-year NACE, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding.
Conclusion:
In patients with de novo AMI, DCB-based PCI showed more favorable clinical outcomes after 2 years of follow-up compared to conventional DES-only PCI. DCB-based PCI may serve as a safe and effective alternative to DES-only PCI in carefully selected patients with satisfactory pre-dilation results (Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in De Novo Coronary Lesion; NCT04619277).
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

