Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

869
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
869
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.8K
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

626
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
626

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of 2-Methoxyethanol as an Alternative Reducing Solvent for the Preparation of <i>cis</i>-[Ru(L)<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>].

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Direct Access to Luminescent <i>meta</i>-Substituted Tris(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)methyl Radicals through Nucleophilic Substitution.

Organic letters·2026
Same author

Papaver S-determinants trigger mitochondrially derived ROS production and disrupt energy metabolism in incompatible pollen tubes.

The Plant cell·2026
Same author

MicrobeDiscover: A Knowledge Graph-Enabled AI Framework for Identifying Microbes for Inorganic Nanomaterial Biosynthesis.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

On the Design of Effective Water-Soluble Actinide-Masking Ligands Through Ligand Structure Modulation.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Retracted: Protective Effects of Naringenin in a Rat Model of Sepsis-Triggered Acute Kidney Injury via Activation of Antioxidant Enzymes and Reduction in Urinary Angiotensinogen.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research·2025
Same journal

An Evolutionary Algorithm Assisted by an Ensemble of Pareto-Optimal Surrogate Models.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

A Quantum Self-Attention Neural Network Model on Quantum Circuits.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Semi-Explicit Solution of Some Discrete-Time Higher-Order-Cost Mean-Field-Type Control.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

A Novel One-Step Small Object Detector for Autonomous Aerial Vehicles.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Online Data-Driven-Based Optimal Output Tracking Control Without Initial Stabilizing Policy.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Digital Redesign-Based Interval State Estimation for Continuous Systems With Aperiodic Discrete Measurements.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K

Preference-Aware Bayesian Optimization for Interactive Decision Making.

Yujie Ma, Ludi Wang, Wenjuan Cui

    IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
    |November 25, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces preference-aware Bayesian optimization (PABO) to efficiently find optimal solutions for complex multiobjective optimization problems by integrating decision-maker feedback. PABO reduces computational costs and improves efficiency in practical applications.

    More Related Videos

    Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication
    07:21

    Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

    Published on: February 9, 2011

    14.0K
    A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
    08:38

    A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

    Published on: November 21, 2019

    8.1K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
    07:05

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

    Published on: September 10, 2018

    6.4K
    Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication
    07:21

    Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

    Published on: February 9, 2011

    14.0K
    A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
    08:38

    A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

    Published on: November 21, 2019

    8.1K

    Area of Science:

    • Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Operations Research

    Background:

    • Real-world optimization problems often involve multiple conflicting objectives.
    • Approximating the Pareto front is a common strategy for multiobjective optimization (MOO).
    • Existing methods struggle to incorporate real-time decision-maker preferences, limiting practical application.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a novel preference-aware Bayesian optimization (PABO) framework.
    • To enable interactive decision-making by integrating decision-maker feedback.
    • To efficiently find a single, most preferred solution from the Pareto-optimal set.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a PABO framework that embeds preference information into candidate solution generation.
    • Dynamically balances exploration of uncertain regions and exploitation of preference-aligned solutions.
    • Incorporates real-time decision-maker feedback throughout the optimization process.

    Main Results:

    • PABO achieves comparable or superior solution quality compared to state-of-the-art methods.
    • Significantly fewer expensive evaluations are required with PABO.
    • Demonstrates improved optimization efficiency and reduced costs.

    Conclusions:

    • PABO offers a more feasible technical approach for practical multiobjective optimization problems.
    • The framework effectively addresses the challenge of incorporating real-time preferences.
    • PABO enhances efficiency and reduces costs in complex optimization scenarios.