Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

08:05
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
Published on: February 10, 2016
6.8K
Facemasks reduce face trustworthiness perceived by deaf individuals.
Maria Arioli1, Andrea Ciricugno2, Chiara Ferrari2,3
1Department of Social and Human Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy. maria.arioli@unibg.it.
Scientific Reports
|November 25, 2025
Summary
Facemasks hinder social inferences for deaf individuals by blocking crucial mouth cues, impacting trustworthiness judgments. This study highlights communication challenges faced by the deaf community during the pandemic.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Audiology
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Facemasks became ubiquitous during the COVID-19 pandemic, posing challenges for deaf individuals reliant on lipreading.
- The mouth region is vital for inferring emotions and forming social impressions.
- The impact of facemasks on social inferences, specifically trustworthiness, in deaf versus hearing individuals remains under-explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether facemasks affect social inferences, particularly trustworthiness judgments, differently in deaf and hearing individuals.
- To explore the role of visual facial cues, specifically the mouth region, in social perception.
Main Methods:
- Participants (deaf and hearing) evaluated the trustworthiness of computer-generated faces.
- Faces were manipulated to display varying levels of trustworthiness.
- Some faces were presented with facemasks occluding the mouth region.
Main Results:
- Deaf and hearing individuals performed similarly in judging faces without facemasks.
- Deaf individuals rated faces with facemasks as less trustworthy compared to hearing participants.
- This suggests facemasks impede the processing of essential facial information for deaf individuals.
Conclusions:
- Facemasks significantly impact trustworthiness judgments for deaf individuals by obstructing vital mouth cues.
- The occlusion of the mouth area prevents holistic facial processing, hindering communication and social interaction for the deaf community.
- Understanding these challenges is crucial for developing more inclusive communication strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
546
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
546
Therapeutic Communication
6.9K
Communication is a lifelong learning process. Through therapeutic communication, nurses can collect relevant assessment data, provide education and counseling, and interact during nursing interventions. Sending and receiving messages occur through verbal and nonverbal communication techniques and can happen separately or simultaneously.
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
6.9K
Understanding Deception
146
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
146
Masking and Demasking Agents
3.4K
EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
3.4K
Prosopagnosia
671
Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...
671
Deindividuation
30.2K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
30.2K

