Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Collection, Isolation, and Flow Cytometric Analysis of Human Endocervical Samples
Published on: July 6, 2014
Forced Sexual Encounters and HIV Pre- and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A
Jacob Bleasdale1,2,3, Drew A Westmoreland1,2, Liana S E Hone2,4
1Department of Epidemiology, Colleges of Medicine & Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Men who have sex with men (MSM) facing forced sexual encounters (FSE) show higher HIV risk. Study reveals FSE linked to increased PEP use but decreased PrEP use, highlighting prevention communication needs.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Sexual Health
Background:
- Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV.
- Forced sexual encounters (FSE) represent a significant risk factor for HIV acquisition among MSM.
- Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are crucial HIV prevention tools, but their use in relation to FSE requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the relationship between experiencing forced sexual encounters (FSE) and the utilization of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM).
- To identify disparities in PrEP and PEP uptake among MSM who have experienced FSE.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study utilizing primary data collected from August 2022 to July 2023.
- Involved a large cohort of 21,373 participants.
- Assessed self-reported history of FSE, past-year PEP use, and current PrEP use.
Main Results:
- 21% of MSM participants reported experiencing FSE within the last 5 years.
- 3.26% reported past-year PEP use, and 24.81% reported current PrEP use.
- MSM who experienced FSE demonstrated higher odds of past-year PEP use but lower odds of current PrEP use compared to those who did not experience FSE.
Conclusions:
- Forced sexual encounters (FSE) are associated with distinct patterns of HIV prevention tool utilization (PEP vs. PrEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM).
- There is a critical need for enhanced communication strategies regarding HIV prevention for MSM at risk of sexual violence.
- Targeted interventions are necessary to ensure equitable access and uptake of both PrEP and PEP for vulnerable MSM populations.
Related Concept Videos
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Retrovirus Life Cycles

