Prognostic interplay between cardiac allograft vasculopathy and coronary vascular function by hybrid rubidium-82

Roberta Assante1, Emilia Zampella1, Irene Mattucci2

  • 1Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy.

Insights

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and impaired microvascular function (MPR) predict adverse events in heart transplant recipients. Early noninvasive assessment of microvascular dysfunction aids risk stratification and treatment planning.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplant Medicine
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major concern in heart transplant recipients.
  • Predicting clinical outcomes in these patients requires robust methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the interrelation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, and coronary vascular function using rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging.
  • To assess the predictive value of these parameters for clinical outcomes in heart transplant patients.

Main Methods:

  • 100 heart transplant patients were studied, with CAC score measured by the Agatston method.
  • Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) were quantified using 82Rb PET/CT.
  • Patients were categorized based on CAC score (<100 vs. ≥100) and MPR (<2 vs. ≥2).

Main Results:

  • During a mean follow-up of 27 months, 35 adverse events occurred.
  • Patients with events had higher prevalence of CAV, impaired MPR, and CAC score ≥100.
  • Multivariable analysis identified CAC score, CAV, and reduced MPR as independent predictors of events.

Conclusions:

  • CAV and reduced MPR are associated with poor prognosis and increased adverse events in heart transplant patients.
  • In patients without CAV, reduced MPR indicates a worse prognosis.
  • Noninvasive evaluation of microcirculatory dysfunction offers improved risk stratification and potential treatment modification for heart transplant recipients.
Abstract