Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026
Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Understanding what drives schools to adopt effective school-based nutrition programs: a cross-sectional study of
Demi Herdegen1,2,3,4, Jannah Jones1,2,3,4, Courtney Barnes1,2,3,4
1Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia.
Background:
Effective school-based nutrition programs can improve children's diet and achieve population-level health outcomes if implemented at scale.
Purpose:
This study aimed to (i) examine the determinants (i.e. the barriers and facilitators) to the adoption of SWAP IT, an effective school-based nutrition program, and (ii) examine associations between these determinants and school characteristics, including school size, socioeconomic status (SES), and geolocation.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted with one key decision maker (e.g. principals, assistant principals, and health and wellbeing officers) from primary schools across New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to identify determinants of SWAP IT adoption and examine associations with school characteristics.
Results:
Key decision makers who responded (n = 160; 47% participation rate) most frequently reported barriers included "expected workload for staff" (n = 52, 33%), and the "perception that parents and carers do not think it is the school's place to provide this information" (n = 31, 19%). The most frequently identified facilitators were to "keep the program free" (n = 60, 38%), and "show evidence that SWAP IT supports the development of healthy habits in children" (n = 18, 11%). Significant associations were found between barriers and the following school characteristics: schools in higher SES areas were more likely to report the "expected workload for staff" (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.3-5.2; P = .006), while schools in lower SES areas more often reported the "perception that parents and carers do not think it is the school's place to provide this information" (OR 2.4; 95% CI: 1.0-5.6; P = .04). No significant associations were found between school characteristics and reported facilitators.
Conclusion:
Barriers to the adoption of school-based nutrition programs can differ by school characteristics, highlighting the importance of considering these factors when scaling up such programs to ensure equitable adoption.
Clinical Trial Information:
The Clinical Trials Registration #ACTRN12623000145606.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Physiological Barriers
The capillary endothelial barrier allows only smaller molecules below 600 Da (Daltons) to pass through. It also restricts drugs like heparin that are bound to blood components, limiting their movement within the bloodstream.
The...
01:27Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
01:30Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
01:18Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
01:25Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
01:20Lifestyle Factors and Health
Benefits of Physical Activity
Physical activity, whether through structured exercise or casual activities like walking, biking, or dancing, is a cornerstone of a...