Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.5K
Bridging the gap in public trust in science: An intergroup relations perspective
Olga Poluektova1, Federica Spaccatini1, Ilaria Giovannelli2
1University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
The British Journal of Social Psychology
|November 26, 2025
Summary
Mistrust in science stems from intergroup dynamics, where some groups view scientists as an out-group. Evidence-based strategies like collaboration and perspective-taking can rebuild public trust in science.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Science Communication
- Public Trust in Science
Background:
- Mistrust in science is a significant societal problem.
- Intergroup dynamics offer a framework for understanding this mistrust.
- Certain groups perceive scientists as a threatening out-group.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the problem of mistrust in science through the lens of intergroup dynamics.
- To identify specific groups that exhibit mistrust towards scientists.
- To propose evidence-based strategies for rebuilding trust between scientists and the public.
Main Methods:
- Review of intergroup dynamics theories.
- Analysis of social-psychological mechanisms underlying mistrust (e.g., perceived moral conflict, symbolic threat).
- Examination of evidence-based interventions.
Main Results:
- Mistrust is often driven by perceptions of scientists as a socially distant out-group.
- Groups with conservative leanings, high social dominance orientation, and science-populist beliefs are key.
- Strategies include structured contact, recategorization, and perspective-taking.
Conclusions:
- Intergroup approaches, tailored to local contexts and guided by research, can rebuild trust.
- Successful interventions involve participatory projects, highlighting shared identities, and reflecting diverse moral perspectives.
- These approaches should complement broader efforts to improve the information environment and social conditions.
Keywords:
intergroup contactintergroup relationsperspective‐takingsocial categorizationstereotype content modeltrust in scienceMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Groups on Groups
222
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
222
Robbers Cave
14.8K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.8K
Social Proof
31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K
Ethics in Research
25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K
In- and Out-Groups
42.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.9K
Stereotype Content Model
15.3K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.3K

