Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026
06:51
Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
Published on: May 30, 2019
7.9K
Standardizing Methodologies in Prosthodontics to Improve Research Reliability and Peer Review Efficiency: A
Seyed Ali Mosaddad1,2,3
1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Bucofacial Prosthesis, Faculty of Odontology Complutense University of Madrid Madrid Spain.
Health Science Reports
|November 26, 2025
Summary
Variability in prosthodontic research methods hinders evidence. A Prosthodontic Research Methodology Council (PRMC) is proposed to create standardized frameworks, enhancing research reliability and peer review for better clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Dental research
- Prosthodontics
- Evidence-based dentistry
Background:
- Prosthodontic research exhibits significant methodological variability, limiting comparability and evidence strength.
- Inconsistencies in research designs impede the reliability of conclusions in prosthodontics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose the establishment of a Prosthodontic Research Methodology Council (PRMC).
- To develop standardized, consensus-based methodological frameworks for prosthodontic research.
- To enhance research reliability and peer review efficiency in prosthodontics.
Main Methods:
- A narrative literature search identified limitations in prosthodontic research methodology.
- Analysis of meta-research studies and consensus frameworks (e.g., CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE) informed the PRMC model.
- Delphi consensus methods are proposed for harmonizing research protocols within the PRMC framework.
Main Results:
- The PRMC model involves a multidisciplinary consortium with a four-phase implementation plan.
- Key phases include guideline development, pilot reviews, and international adoption.
- Expected outcomes are improved reproducibility, comparability, reduced systematic review heterogeneity, and efficient peer review.
Conclusions:
- The PRMC framework offers a structured solution to methodological variability in prosthodontics.
- Harmonized study designs and international collaboration are expected to improve research reliability.
- This initiative aims to facilitate the integration of high-quality evidence into clinical practice.
Keywords:
consensus development conferences as topicdigital dentistryevidence‐based dentistryprosthodonticsresearch designMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
02:07Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...