Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

High-Throughput Live Imaging of Microcolonies to Measure Heterogeneity in Growth and Gene Expression
Published on: April 18, 2021
Phenotypic heterogeneity in lag reflects an evolutionarily stable bet-hedging strategy
Abir George1, Ned S Wingreen2, Gautam Reddy3
1Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Abstract:
Single-cell experiments in yeast reveal two distinct heritable phenotypes-'arresters' and 'recoverers'-when a clonal population experiences a negative shift in its growth environment. Recoverers exhibit a variable yet finite lag before resuming growth in the new environment, whereas arresters remain in a non-growing, arrested state until more favorable conditions return. Although the diversification of individual cells into arresters and recoverers is a robust phenomenon, it remains unclear whether this coexistence constitutes an evolutionarily stable strategy. Here, we demonstrate that a heterogeneous strategy composed of both arrester and recoverer phenotypes maximizes long-term population fitness across a broad spectrum of growth-lag trade-offs. Our analysis employs a dynamic programming framework to identify the fitness-maximizing distribution of phenotypes for populations that stochastically switch between preferred and non-preferred environments. We propose a minimal model incorporating metabolism, growth, and enzyme allocation to explain the physiological origin of a power-law growth-lag trade-off that favors phenotypic heterogeneity. The theory predicts a nontrivial relationship between the fraction of recoverers and their lag time, which aligns with existing data from wild yeast strains, evolved isolates, and variations in pre-shift growth conditions. This relationship suggests an evolutionary 'rheostat'-like mechanism that enables populations to rapidly adapt to changing environmental conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Epistasis
Speciation Rates
Law of Segregation
Types of Selection
Position-effect Variegation

