Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
Published on: March 31, 2022
Peer Review of Scientific Studies: Problems and Potential Solutions
Sunanda Gupta1, Aruddha Sarkar2
1Community and Family Medicine, Central Armed Police Forces Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS-CAPFIMS), New Delhi, IND.
Scientific peer review faces trust issues due to vulnerabilities like bias and delays. Reforms are proposed to enhance credibility, including professionalizing review and using AI.
Area of Science:
- Scholarly communication
- Scientific publishing integrity
Background:
- Peer review is the traditional cornerstone of scientific credibility.
- Its efficacy lacks empirical proof, and current practices face significant challenges.
- Issues include bias, delays, lack of transparency, and declining reviewer engagement.
More Related Videos
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Blind Procedures
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs