Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
Prognostic Implications of Heart Rate Score and Its Temporal Change in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction:
Masato Okada1, Koichi Inoue1,2, Nobuaki Tanaka1
1Cardiovascular Center Sakurabashi Watanabe Advanced Healthcare Hospital Osaka Japan.
Background:
Heart rate score (HrSc) ≥ 70% reflects chronotropic incompetence and predicts prognosis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. However, its prognostic value in Japanese patients remains underexplored, and longitudinal changes in HrSc and their contributing factors are poorly characterized.
Methods:
This post hoc analysis of the Heart Failure Indication and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial in Japan (HINODE) included 172 patients with CIEDs and LV ejection fraction ≤ 50%. HrSc, defined as the percentage of all atrial-paced and sensed beats in a single tallest 10 beat/min device histogram bin, was assessed using remote monitoring.
Results:
At baseline, the median HrSc was 53% (interquartile range, 41%-83%), with 68 (39.5%) patients having HrSc ≥ 70%. During the 2-year follow-up, the incidence of all-cause death or heart failure (HF) events was similar between patients with HrSc ≥ 70% and < 70% (31.1% vs. 29.4%, log-rank p = 0.862). However, among 142 patients whose follow-up data were available, HrSc increased from < 70% to ≥ 70% in 13 patients (13%) and decreased from ≥ 70% to < 70% in 19 (9.1%). An increase in HrSc was associated with lower LV ejection fraction, antiarrhythmic drug initiation, increased lower rate limit, and HF events.
Conclusion:
In the HINODE study, baseline HrSc ≥ 70% was not predictive of 2-year cardiovascular outcomes. However, HrSc changed in approximately one-quarter of patients and was associated with clinical and device-related factors, as well as HF events. HrSc is not a static measure but a dynamic marker that reflects evolving patient conditions and CIED programming.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Factors Influencing Heart Rate
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations