Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Treatment Model for Young Patients with Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction and Resultant Infertility
Published on: May 30, 2025
Patients Prefer Human Empathy, but Not Always Human Wording: A Single-Blind Within-Subject Trial of GPT-Generated vs.
Dea Samardzic1, Jelena Curkovic1, Donald Okmazic1
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Written discharge explanations are crucial for patient understanding and safety in emergency eye care, yet their tone and clarity vary. Large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence systems trained to generate human-like text) can produce patient-friendly materials, but direct, blinded comparisons with clinician-written texts remain scarce. This study compared patient perceptions of a routine clinician-written discharge text and a GPT-5-generated explanation, where GPT-5 (OpenAI) is a state-of-the-art LLM, based on the same clinical facts in emergency ophthalmology. The primary objective was empathy; secondary outcomes included clarity, detail, usefulness, trust, satisfaction, and intention to follow advice. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-blind, within-subject study in the Emergency Ophthalmology Unit of the University Hospital Centre Split, Croatia. Adults (n = 129) read two standardized texts (clinician-written vs. GPT-5-generated), presented in identical format and in randomized order under masking. Each participant rated both on Likert scales with 1-5 points. Paired comparisons used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with effect sizes, and secondary outcomes were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate. Results: Empathy ratings were lower for the GPT-5-generated text than for the clinician-written text (means 3.97 vs. 4.30; mean difference -0.33; 95% CI -0.44 to -0.22; p < 0.001). After correcting for multiple comparisons, no secondary outcome differed significantly between sources. Preferences were evenly split (47.8% preferred GPT-5 among those expressing a preference). Conclusions: In emergency ophthalmology, GPT-5-generated explanations approached clinician-written materials on most perceived attributes but were rated less empathic. A structured, human-in-the-loop workflow-in which LLM-generated drafts are reviewed and tailored by clinicians-appears prudent for safe, patient-centered deployment.
More Related Videos
04:00Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings
Published on: August 2, 2024
07:50A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Empathy
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...