Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026

Same author

Impact of Parameter Predictability and Joint Modeling of Response Accuracy and Response Time on Ability Estimates.

Applied psychological measurement·2025

Same author

A Bayesian Random Weights Linear Logistic Test Model for Within-Test Practice Effects.

Applied psychological measurement·2023

Same author

A Bayesian General Model to Account for Individual Differences in Operation-Specific Learning Within a Test.

Educational and psychological measurement·2023

Same author

Nominal Factor Analysis of Situational Judgment Tests: Evaluation of Latent Dimensionality and Factorial Invariance.

Educational and psychological measurement·2021

Same author

A Bayesian Generalized Explanatory Item Response Model to Account for Learning During the Test.

Psychometrika·2021

Same journal

Career Adaptability and Academic Achievement Among Chinese High School Students: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study of Social Cognitive and Metacognitive Mediating Mechanisms.

Journal of Intelligence·2026

Same journal

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Preservice Science Teachers' Analogical Reasoning: Evidence from Analogy Design.

Journal of Intelligence·2026

Same journal

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Instruction on Student Learning in STEM: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of Intelligence·2026

Same journal

Reading and Writing Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Adolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.

Journal of Intelligence·2026

Same journal

Emotional Intelligence, Self-Regulation, and Children's Well-Being in Fourth-Grade Students: Cross-Sectional Associations from Türkiye.

Journal of Intelligence·2026

Same journal

Detecting Demographic Influences on Measures of Spatial Ability with Rasch Tree Analysis.

Journal of Intelligence·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

An Analysis of Individual Differences in Within-Test Practice Effects in Progressive Matrices.

José H Lozano¹, Susan E Embretson², Javier Revuelta¹

¹Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Journal of Intelligence

|November 26, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences in practice effects during abstract reasoning tests were observed. These effects, related to rule learning, correlate with intelligence, suggesting a link between cognitive abilities and test familiarity.

Keywords:

linear logistic test model non-verbal reasoning operation-specific learning person-specific effects practice effect progressive matrices

More Related Videos

Using MazeSuite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation

Using MazeSuite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation

Published on: October 8, 2011

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

Using MazeSuite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation

Using MazeSuite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation

Published on: October 8, 2011

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Psychometrics
Educational Assessment

Background:

Progressive matrices are widely used to assess abstract reasoning.
Understanding practice effects is crucial for accurate ability measurement.
Carpenter et al.'s taxonomy provides a theoretical basis for abstract rules.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate individual differences in practice effects in progressive matrices.
To examine rule learning at an individual level using the Abstract Reasoning Test (ART).
To explore the relationship between practice effects and intelligence measures.

Main Methods:

Utilized data from 765 military recruits on the ART.
Employed a random weights operation-specific learning model (RWOSLM) to analyze practice effects.
Correlated individual practice effects with external measures of intelligence and abilities.

Main Results:

Found significant individual differences in rule learning during the ART.
Observed decreases in difficulty related to pairwise progression and figure manipulation.
Identified between-person variability in practice effects for specific figural properties and rule types.

Conclusions:

Practice effects in progressive matrices are not uniform across individuals.
Individual differences in practice effects are linked to cognitive abilities and intelligence.
The ART effectively captures individual learning trajectories and their relation to broader intellect.