Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

An Approach to Study Shape-Dependent Transcriptomics at a Single Cell Level
Published on: November 2, 2020
Sex Differences in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Evidence Gaps and Future Directions
Sophie L V M Stroeks1, Shanelle Oko-Osi2, Arianna Arasu2
1Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands; KU Leuven, Cardiovascular Sciences, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; European Reference Network for Rare, Low Prevalence and Complex Diseases of the Heart (ERN GUARD-Heart), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Insights
Sex significantly impacts dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) outcomes and genetic risks. Understanding these sex-specific differences is crucial for developing personalized risk models and improving care for all DCM patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Sex Differences in Medicine
Background:
- Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a major cause of heart failure and heart transplantation, affecting 1 in 250 individuals.
- DCM is thought to be more common in men, but biological sex differences versus underdiagnosis in women are unclear.
- Existing risk stratification tools may not adequately address sex-specific variations in DCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the impact of biological sex on the epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes of DCM.
- To analyze sex-specific genetic influences on arrhythmia and heart failure risks in DCM patients.
- To identify gaps in knowledge and advocate for sex-specific research and risk models in DCM.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of existing studies on sex and DCM.
- Analysis of genotype-specific risks for arrhythmias and heart failure in male and female DCM patients.
- Review of genetic, environmental, and reproductive factors influencing sex disparities in DCM.
Main Results:
- Male DCM patients with PLN, DSP, and LMNA variants showed higher arrhythmia rates than TTNtv and BAG3 carriers.
- Female DCM patients with RBM20, DSP, and PLN variants had the highest arrhythmia risk; TTNtv carriers had the lowest.
- PLN and LMNA variants posed the highest heart failure risk in both sexes; BAG3, RBM20, and TTN variants showed lower heart failure rates in females compared to males.
Conclusions:
- Sex and genotype significantly influence clinical outcomes and genetic risks in DCM.
- Current sex-neutral risk stratification tools may lead to undertreatment of women.
- Expanded representation of women in DCM studies and development of sex-specific risk models are essential for equitable personalized care.
Abstract:
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which affects 1 in 250 people, is a leading global cause of heart failure and the most common indication for heart transplantation. Evidence suggests that DCM is more prevalent in men, but whether this reflects biological differences or underdiagnosis in women remains uncertain. This review explores the impact of sex on DCM, examining differences in epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentation, treatment response, and outcomes. Women often present with less severe cardiac phenotypes, including lower levels of fibrosis and better left ventricular function, yet the long-term prognosis of DCM in women is less clear. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that male DCM patients with variants in PLN, DSP, and LMNA had higher arrhythmic event rates compared with TTNtv and BAG3 carriers. In female patients with DCM, those with RBM20, DSP, and PLN variants faced the highest arrhythmic risk, and TTNtv carriers the lowest. PLN and LMNA variants had the highest heart failure risk in both sexes, whereas BAG3, RBM20, and TTN variants had lower heart failure rates in female compared with male carriers. These findings highlight the influence of sex and genotype on clinical outcomes. Current risk-stratification tools, such as those used for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, may undertreat women owing to reliance on sex-neutral thresholds. We highlight the role of genetic, environmental, and reproductive factors in shaping these disparities, including the influence of pregnancy, pregnancy complications, and menopause. This review identifies key gaps in knowledge and calls for expanded representation of women in DCM studies and the development of sex-specific risk models. Addressing these gaps is essential to improving outcomes and advancing equitable personalized care for all DCM patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

