Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022
Cardiac Remodeling After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Insights From Multimodality Imaging
Robin Le Ruz1, Vratika Agarwal2, Isaac George2
1Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Interventional Cardiology Department, l'institut du thorax, F-44000, Nantes, France; Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, CNRS, INSERM, l'institut du thorax, F-44000, Nantes, France; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Background:
Few studies have evaluated ventricular remodeling following transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) for tricuspid regurgitation.
Objectives:
The authors sought to describe biventricular structural and functional changes after TTVR.
Methods:
This single-center, retrospective study included all patients undergoing TTVR. Remodeling was evaluated using transthoracic echocardiographic and cardiac computed tomography (CT). CT measurements included: right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (RVEF), effective RVEF (forward stroke volume [SV]/right ventricular end-diastolic volume [RVEDV]), RV coupling (SV/right ventricular end-systolic volume [RVESV]), septal curvature analysis and average eccentricity index (aEI) of the mid- and distal left ventricle (LV).
Results:
Of the 80 TTVR patients included, 87.5% had baseline massive/torrential and 95.9% had ≤mild tricuspid regurgitation post-implantation. Post-TTVR, all transthoracic echocardiographic measures of RV function were reduced (P < 0.001) with an increase in SV and cardiac index (P < 0.001). Paired analysis of 50 patients with pre- and post-CT imaging (performed median of 40 days post-TTVR) showed a 65.3% increase in effective RVEF and 20.3% increase in RV coupling (P < 0.001 for both). RVEDV decreased (138.2 mL/m2 to 59.5 mL/m2; P < 0.001) with increase in LVEDV (49.6 mL/m2 to 57.9 mL/m2; P = 0.001). Septal curvature increased and LV aEI decreased (P < 0.001 for both). Compared with patients with low aEI, patients with baseline greater aEI (≥1.25) showed greater reverse remodeling, lower follow-up NT-proBNP, and greater symptom improvement.
Conclusions:
Reduction in RVEDV with increase in LVEDV following TTVR is associated with reduction in LV eccentricity with an increase in forward SV. CT measures of RV function (effective RVEF) and RV coupling (SV/RVESV) both improve following TTVR. Patients with baseline higher LV eccentricity may derive more benefits from TTVR.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

