Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
Published on: May 10, 2019
Latencies of Pulsed Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions and Their Relation to Auditory Brainstem Responses
Ernst Dalhoff1, Dennis Zelle1,2, Katharina Bader3
1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Str. 5, Tübingen, 72076, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Purpose:
To assess system properties of the human auditory system, such as cochlear gain, frequency selectivity, and their dependence on frequency and level, it is essential to examine the interrelation of various readouts. By measuring and analyzing otoacoustic emission (OAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) latencies, among others, predictions of cochlear models and applicability of properties such as the minimum-phase principle, level dependence of latencies, or related changes of the gain of a presumed positive-feedback mechanism can be investigated.
Methods:
Here, we present measurements of the latency of the nonlinear-distortion component of pulsed distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) ( = 1-14 kHz, = 25-85 dB SPL) in 20 ears (12 female, 8 male). This yields a direct estimate of intracochlear traveling-wave build-up by recording the time elapsed between the primary stimulus and the distortion-product pulse response. Thus, this technique does not require deriving latency from phase gradients of the coherent-reflection component of different frequencies, as is done using swept-tone DPOAE or SFOAE.
Results:
At low stimulus levels ( = 35 dB), DPOAE latency was 13 ms at = 1 kHz, exponentially to 2 ms at = 12-14 kHz. In periods of the corresponding frequency, this rose from 13 periods at 1 kHz to 25 periods above 6 kHz. Between 3 and 6 kHz, latency showed a steeper rise, departing from a pure exponential relation. Level dependence of latencies varied among subjects, with changes ranging from -2 to -12% per 10 dB level increase. Test-retest reliability of latency determination with pulsed DPOAE was excellent.
Conclusion:
For frequencies above 1 kHz and up to 14 kHz, OAE latency data align with a scaling law of 0.3 dB/dB. A transition region between 3 and 6 kHz shows scaling in some ears approaching 1 dB/dB, violating local scaling symmetry. Although comparison with ABR literature reveals some unresolved discrepancies, latencies of pulsed DPOAE allow a way to estimate cochlear tuning properties.
Related Concept Videos
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Beats
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...

