Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Forces01:09

Types of Forces

14.1K
In most situations, forces can be grouped into two categories: contact forces and field forces.  Contact forces occur as a result of direct physical contact between objects. Field forces, however, act without the necessity of physical contact between objects. They depend on the presence of a "field" in the region of space surrounding the body under consideration. You can think of a field as a property of space that is detectable by the forces it exerts. Scientists think there...
14.1K
Force01:06

Force

30.8K
Forces affect every moment of our life. Our bodies are held to the Earth by force, and they are held together by the forces of charged particles. When we open a door, walk down a street, lift a fork, or touch a baby's face, we are applying force. Our body's atoms are held together by electrical forces, and the core of an atom, called the nucleus, is held together by the strongest force known to us—nuclear force.
The study of motion is called kinematics, but kinematics only...
30.8K
Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

2.3K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
2.3K
Forces Acting on Chromosomes02:11

Forces Acting on Chromosomes

3.8K
During mitosis, chromosome movements occur through the interplay of multiple piconewton level forces. In prometaphase, these forces help in chromosome assembly or congression at the equatorial plane, eventually leading to their alignment at the metaphase plate. The forces acting on the chromosomes are space and time-dependent; therefore, they vary with the position of the chromosomes as the cell progresses through mitosis. 
Microtubules and motor proteins exert two types of forces on...
3.8K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

63.0K
Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
63.0K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

19.2K
19.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Designing research interfaces for non-human minds: a biocentric design approach for animal cognition research.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

Despotism promotes dyadic cooperation through enhanced interdependencies in non-human primate societies.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Chimpanzees are not more aggressive than bonobos but target sexes differently.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) show an attentional bias toward a male secondary sexual trait.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2025
Same author

Reactions to social videos in long-tailed macaques.

Animal cognition·2025
Same author

Bonobos and chimpanzees overlap in sexual behaviour patterns during social tension.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Constructing an architecture for a decolonized developmental science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Go WILD, but mind the gap.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILDing the study of developmental trajectories in navigation and wayfinding: Progress and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILD kids, cutting-edge research. Enhancing diversity and reflexivity in psychology.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Ethnographic methods can help psychology overcome its WEIRD problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Measurement of Force-Sensitive Protein Dynamics in Living Cells Using a Combination of Fluorescent Techniques
08:28

Measurement of Force-Sensitive Protein Dynamics in Living Cells Using a Combination of Fluorescent Techniques

Published on: November 2, 2018

8.7K

On the forces that bind us.

Edwin J C van Leeuwen1,2, Tom S Roth1

  • 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Universityhttps://ror.org/04pp8hn57, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, the Netherlands e.j.c.vanleeuwen@uu.nl https://www.uu.nl/staff/EJCvanLeeuwen.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|November 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Group-living animals face fragmentation. This study proposes bondedness, tolerance, cultural transmission, and dominance dynamics as key mechanisms to enhance social cohesion and group stability.

More Related Videos

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

3.4K
A Direct Force Probe for Measuring Mechanical Integration Between the Nucleus and the Cytoskeleton
05:47

A Direct Force Probe for Measuring Mechanical Integration Between the Nucleus and the Cytoskeleton

Published on: July 29, 2018

16.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Measurement of Force-Sensitive Protein Dynamics in Living Cells Using a Combination of Fluorescent Techniques
08:28

Measurement of Force-Sensitive Protein Dynamics in Living Cells Using a Combination of Fluorescent Techniques

Published on: November 2, 2018

8.7K
Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

3.4K
A Direct Force Probe for Measuring Mechanical Integration Between the Nucleus and the Cytoskeleton
05:47

A Direct Force Probe for Measuring Mechanical Integration Between the Nucleus and the Cytoskeleton

Published on: July 29, 2018

16.7K

Area of Science:

  • Social behavior
  • Animal ecology
  • Evolutionary biology

Background:

  • Group-living animals often experience social fragmentation, impacting group stability and individual well-being.
  • Existing models often link sociality to cognition, but may overlook other crucial factors.
  • Understanding the mechanisms promoting social cohesion is vital for conservation and welfare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and elaborate on strategies addressing social fragmentation in group-living animals.
  • To highlight the roles of bondedness and tolerance in maintaining group stability and social interactions.
  • To challenge static models by emphasizing context-dependent socio-ecological pressures on social traits.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework development based on existing literature.
  • Integration of Dunbar's proposals with complementary mechanisms.
  • Analysis of how various factors influence social cohesion.

Main Results:

  • Bondedness is identified as a key factor mitigating stress and providing structural support for group stability.
  • Tolerance is proposed as a complementary mechanism that smooths social interactions.
  • Variation in cohesion-promoting traits is linked to context-dependent socio-ecological pressures, not solely cognition.

Conclusions:

  • Social cohesion in group-living animals is promoted by multiple interacting mechanisms, including bondedness, tolerance, cultural transmission, and dominance dynamics.
  • These mechanisms help align behavior and reduce uncertainty, thereby enhancing group stability.
  • Future research should consider dynamic, context-dependent factors rather than static cognitive links when studying sociality.