Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
Published on: August 17, 2015
Confidence Intervals for Validation of Analytical Procedures Under ICH Q2(R2)
Paul Faya1, Chad N Wolfe1, Adam P Rauk1
1Eli Lilly and Company, Discovery and Development Statistics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
The International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Quality Guidance Q2(R2) now requires confidence intervals to align with acceptance criteria and permits using prior knowledge for analytical procedure validation. This paper offers practical examples and methods for compliance.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Analytical Chemistry
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- The International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Quality Guidance Q2(R2) was adopted in 2023.
- Revision R2 introduces new requirements for analytical procedure validation, impacting accuracy and precision assessments.
- These changes necessitate updated approaches for demonstrating validation compliance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide practical guidance on implementing the new ICH Q2(R2) requirements for analytical procedure validation.
- To illustrate methods for calculating confidence intervals compatible with acceptance criteria.
- To demonstrate techniques for integrating prior knowledge into validation conclusions.
Main Methods:
- Detailed examples of confidence interval computations for accuracy and precision using various statistical models.
- Methodologies for combining prior knowledge (frequentist and Bayesian approaches) with validation data.
- Tutorial-style explanations tailored for statisticians and analytical scientists.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated calculation of confidence intervals for key validation performance characteristics.
- Presented methods for incorporating prior knowledge into validation study interpretations.
- Provided a framework for meeting ICH Q2(R2) compliance regarding acceptance criteria and prior data.
Conclusions:
- The revised ICH Q2(R2) guidance offers flexibility but requires careful statistical consideration.
- Implementing compatible confidence intervals and utilizing prior knowledge can enhance validation efficiency.
- This work equips scientists with the tools to navigate the updated validation landscape effectively.
More Related Videos
07:57Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
Published on: July 25, 2014
10:22Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square
Interpreting R Charts
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals