Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
Role of non-invasive serological and CT imaging parameters in assessing portal hypertensive gastropathy severity
Zhenzhen Liu1, Bilun Ke2, Shuyan Tan2
1Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Introduction:
To compare serological and CT imaging parameters between the mild and severe portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) group, and find out the non-invasive predictive markers for PHG severity based on these differences.
Methods:
Three hundred one patients were enrolled in our retrospective study. The PHG severity was assessed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and serological markers were measured within 48 h before EGD, and CT scans were performed within one week after EGD. Differences in age, gender, etiology, serological and CT imaging parameters, and arterial-phase gastric wall enhancement in CT scans were analyzed between the mild and severe PHG groups.
Results:
No significant differences were observed in gender, age, etiology, serological markers, or MELD score between the two groups (all P > 0.05). However, spleen length, spleen volume, PLT/spleen length ratio, and PLT/spleen volume ratio differed significantly (P = 0.003, 0.011, 0.019, and 0.014, respectively). The optimal cutoff values for predicting PHG severity were 131.4 (AUC = 0.619), 613.29 (AUC = 0.596), 0.42 (AUC = 0.588), and 0.07 (AUC = 0.592), respectively. Patients with severe PHG demonstrated significantly greater arterial-phase gastric wall enhancement compared to mild PHG cases.
Conclusion:
Spleen length, spleen volume, and the platelet-to-spleen ratios presented predictive value for PHG severity, albeit with limited discriminative ability. Additionally, moderate-to-severe arterial phase gastric wall enhancement in CT scans may serve as a potential indicator of severe PHG.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...

