Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Phase IV international prospective validation of the EORTC patient satisfaction core questionnaire (EORTC PATSAT-C33)
Anne Brédart1, Jean-Luc Kop2, Omar Shamieh3
1Psycho-Oncology Unit, SHARE Team, Institut Curie, PSL, Paris, & Health Process & Psychopathology Laboratory, University Paris Cité, LPPS EA 4057, Boulogne Billancourt, France. anne.bredart@curie.fr.
Background:
Advances in cancer care require ongoing monitoring of patient satisfaction using rigorous questionnaires. The EORTC Quality of Life Group has cross-culturally developed a patient satisfaction core questionnaire (PATSAT-C33) to be used in any hospital cancer care settings and an outpatient satisfaction module (OUT-PATSAT7) to address specific aspects of ambulatory care. This multi-center international prospective study aimed to validate the PATSAT-C33 and OUT-PATSAT7, including assessing its acceptability.
Methods:
Patients (N = 690) affected by any cancer site or stage equally distributed by age and gender, were enrolled in in- and out-patient cancer settings from 20 institutions, 12 countries and 5 geographic/cultural areas. Among them, 675 completed the PATSAT-C33 alongside the EORTC QLQ-C30, Oberst's perception of care quality 5-item, and 'intention to recommend the hospital' 1-item. Among the 532 outpatients, 526 also completed the OUT-PATSAT7. A subset completed a two-week retest (N = 120 & 96 for the PATSAT-C33 & OUT-PATSAT7, respectively) or one-year responsiveness-to-change assessment (RCA) (N = 166 & 155). Comprehensive psychometric testing was performed.
Results:
Full item completion was high (85% & 88%), 83% of patients took ≤ 20 min to complete both questionnaires (40 items); 5% of patients required help with understanding questionnaire items. Confirmatory factor analyses evidenced satisfactory fit on the eleven PATSAT-C33 and two OUT-PATSAT7 multi-item scales (CFI/TLI > 0.90; RMSEA < 0.10 and = 0.108, respectively). Internal consistency was good to excellent (all ≥ 0.80); test-retest reliability was fair (0.48, 1 scale), good (0.60-0.74, 11 scales) to excellent (≥ 0.75, 7 scales). Convergent validity was supported by correlations of ≥ 0.40 with related Oberst's scales and < 0.30 with unrelated QLQ-C30 scales. Known-groups differences was shown for comorbidity, toxicity, global health, care expectations and intention to recommend the hospital. Change over time was captured in groups defined based on change in global health, cancer care setting, and the receipt of supportive care over the past year.
Conclusions:
This study supports the psychometric robustness of the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and OUT-PATSAT7 and their promising usefulness in monitoring cancer care within and across cancer care settings from different cultures and cancer patient populations.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05989191, August 2, 2023.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Clinical Trials: Overview
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Nursing Evaluation

