Comparison of the Effects of Elastic and Rigid Taping on Gross Motor Function, Balance, and Functional Capacity in

Duygu Korkem Yorulmaz1, Rıdvan Gök2, Emine Handan Tüzün3

  • 1Gulhane Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, 06010 Ankara, Turkey.

PubMed

Insights

Kinesio taping (KT) and rigid taping (RT) both significantly improve motor function, balance, and functional capacity in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP). Neither taping method showed superiority, suggesting clinical preference guides choice.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP) significantly impacts children's gross motor function, balance, and functional capacity.
  • Physiotherapy is a cornerstone of management, with adjunct therapies explored to enhance outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of Kinesio taping (KT) and rigid taping (RT) as adjuncts to physiotherapy in children with HCP.
  • To evaluate the impact of KT and RT on gross motor function, balance, and functional capacity.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, single-blinded trial involving 52 children (aged 7-16) with HCP.
  • Standardized assessments included the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (PBBS), Time-Up-and-Go (TUG), and 2-Minute Walk Test (2-MWT).

Main Results:

  • Both KT and RT groups demonstrated significant intra-group improvements across all outcome measures (GMFM, PBBS, TUG, 2-MWT; p ≤ 0.001).
  • While nonparametric analysis hinted at greater improvements with KT for TUG and 2-MWT, adjusted statistical models revealed no significant inter-group differences between KT and RT.
  • Specifically, adjusted p-values for 2-MWT and TUG were 0.29 and 0.087, respectively.

Conclusions:

  • Kinesio taping and rigid taping are equally effective adjuncts to physiotherapy for improving gross motor function, balance, and functional capacity in children with HCP.
  • The selection between KT and RT should be based on clinical considerations such as patient tolerance and specific therapeutic objectives, rather than perceived differences in efficacy.

Related Concept Videos