Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games
Published on: July 3, 2021
Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of Two Measures of Agentic Engagement
Estefania Guerrero1,2, Georgina Guilera1,2, Alba Aza3
1Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract:
This study focuses on the adaptation and psychometric validation of the Spanish versions of the Agentic Engagement Scale (AES) and the Enlarged Version of the Agentic Engagement Scale (EVAES) in Spanish undergraduate students. Agentic engagement, denoting the educational insights provided by students during classroom instruction, has garnered attention for its potential impact on teaching and learning. Reeve initially developed the AES in 2013, which Mameli and Passini extended from 5 to 10 items in 2019 to create the EVAES. In a sample of 278 undergraduate students, this study thoroughly examined various psychometric properties, including item response distribution, factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity evidence. The results consistently demonstrated high item-total correlations, a one-factor structure, good internal consistency, and satisfactory test-retest reliability for both scales. Additionally, the study established validity evidence through positive and significant correlations between agentic engagement and academic engagement, as well as with personality traits such as extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience. In conclusion, the Spanish versions of the AES and EVAES emerge as promising tools for assessing agentic engagement among Spanish-speaking undergraduate students, offering valuable insights into their active participation and contributions to the instructional process.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Reliability and Validity
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

