Sarcopenic Obesity and Sarcopenic Visceral Obesity, Calculated Using the Skeletal Muscle İndex and Visceral Fat İndex...

Objective: Obesity increases the risk of endometrial cancer (EC). In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and sarcopenic visceral obesity, calculated with the help of cross-sectional imaging methods of muscle and visceral adipose tissue from body composition parameters, in EC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with EC were identified between January 2014 and June 2024. The combination of radiological markers and patient outcomes can predict prognosis. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) and visceral fat index (VFI) were calculated from computed tomography (CT) and/or abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) scans taken at the time of diagnosis at the Lumbal 3 (L3) vertebra level. The findings of these analyses demonstrate the strongest correlation with the ratio of muscle and visceral fat tissue throughout the body. The loss of muscle and fat is an unfavourable indicator in patients with EC. The present study analysed the prognostic values of sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, sarcopenic visceral obesity, and the visceral fat index in EC. The total skeletal muscle area was calculated in square centimetres. Body surface area (m²) was calculated using the Mosteller formula: ((height (cm) × weight (kg))/3600)^1/2. To normalize body composition components, the skeletal muscle index was calculated as cm²/m². Results: The study comprised a total of 236 EC patients. The prevalence of sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and sarcopenic visceral obesity were found to be 48.31%, 33.47%, and 22.88%, respectively. The presence of sarcopenia, high VFI levels, sarcopenic obesity, and sarcopenic visceral obesity did not demonstrate statistical significance in the survival analysis. However, stage increase (p = 0.001), primary tumour localization in the lower uterine segment (p = 0.001), serous carcinoma (p = 0.001), increased grade in endometrioid carcinoma (p = 0.023), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with increased mortality risk. The presence of sarcopenia was found to be significant in patients with obesity (p = 0.008) and those aged ≥ 65 years (p = 0.001). Conclusions: In EC survival, established prognostic factors such as serous histopathology, LVI positivity, and the extent of surgical staging are prioritised. The presence of these well-established markers means the potential effect of BMI-based observations, such as the 'obesity paradox', and even body composition measurements, such as sarcopenic obesity, are now statistically insignificant. Our findings suggest that aggressive tumour biology (serous type, LVI) and surgery, rather than metabolic variables such as sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and sarcopenic visceral obesity, are the direct reason for the survival difference. This is due to the tumour's aggressive nature and clinical characteristics (e.g., age at diagnosis, operability, stage, primary tumour localization in the lower uterine segment, serous carcinoma, grade, and LVI positivity) rather than metabolic variables.